|
 |
Is there a limit to how many times Supercone macro can be used. I just added
one more to a pic I'm making and it's acting as a regular cone.
Supercone(<0,0,0>,.034375,.06875,<0,.1375,0>,.06875,.06875)
Or in this case it is acting as a cylinder of .06875 radius. I even tried
making the small radious .0001 and it still came out as a cylinder.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
Barehunter <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> Supercone(<0,0,0>,.034375,.06875,<0,.1375,0>,.06875,.06875)
It seems to be a problem of scale. If you multiply everything by 100,
the shape renders just ok. However, with such small values as those
there's a quite odd think happening there.
What makes this odd is that the problem does not happen with the
quartic. If you render the quartic alone with no intersection nor
bounded_by, it renders just fine even at that scale. However, both
the intersection with the cylinder and the bounding by the cone
gives odd results at those scales. I have no idea why.
--
#macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb M()}}
N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
Warp <war### [at] tag povrayorg> wrote:
> It seems to be a problem of scale. If you multiply everything by 100,
> the shape renders just ok. However, with such small values as those
> there's a quite odd think happening there.
>>>SNIP<<<
odd indeed. I tried this. I made it a declared object with the radii
multiplyed by ten. then I called the object and hit it with .1 scale in X
and Z axis and it worked. thanks for pointing it out.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
