On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 17:18:08 -0500, Tyler Eaves <tyl### [at] NOSPAMml1net>
wrote:

>On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 22:17:00 +0000, IMBJR wrote:
>
>
>> 
>> What on Earth makes you think it is? My what twisted brain-spasm-logic
>> came up with that idea?
>> 
>
>
>On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 20:39:54 +0000, IMBJR wrote:
>
>> Keep the fuck up. Did I not say elsewhere that if I wanted comments I
>> would ask for them? I post them because I have something to post. This
>> is a POV-Ray newserver is it not? I wish to let people look at my work
>> if they so wish, I don't expect or require comments.
>
>Comments like that perhaps?

That's it, quote something out of context. Is that the way you try to
win your silly little arguments? Dear me, it's pathetic, simply
pathetic.

--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 22:30:44 +0000, IMBJR wrote:

> On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 17:18:08 -0500, Tyler Eaves <tyl### [at] NOSPAMml1net>
> wrote:
> 
>>On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 22:17:00 +0000, IMBJR wrote:
>>
>>
>>> 
>>> What on Earth makes you think it is? My what twisted brain-spasm-logic
>>> came up with that idea?
>>> 
>>
>>
>>On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 20:39:54 +0000, IMBJR wrote:
>>
>>> Keep the fuck up. Did I not say elsewhere that if I wanted comments I
>>> would ask for them? I post them because I have something to post. This
>>> is a POV-Ray newserver is it not? I wish to let people look at my work
>>> if they so wish, I don't expect or require comments.
>>
>>Comments like that perhaps?
> 
> That's it, quote something out of context. Is that the way you try to
> win your silly little arguments? Dear me, it's pathetic, simply
> pathetic.

How precisely is that out of context? I posted the entire quote. It was in
response to the following post by Rune:

...or post images to p.b.i without any interest in getting feedback or
even if other people can see the images. I expect that we'll be seeing
quite some more JPEG2000 images there now - oops, "seeing" was not a
well chosen word... ;)

I don't think it's at all "out of context", as in both cases the topic at
hand is proper use of povray.binaries.images. In any case, this is *your*
"silly little argument". If you're so unhappy with the situation, *leave*.

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 17:30:38 -0500, Tyler Eaves <tyl### [at] NOSPAMml1net>
wrote:

>How precisely is that out of context? I posted the entire quote. It was in
>response to the following post by Rune:
>
>...or post images to p.b.i without any interest in getting feedback or
>even if other people can see the images. I expect that we'll be seeing
>quite some more JPEG2000 images there now - oops, "seeing" was not a
>well chosen word... ;)
>
>I don't think it's at all "out of context", as in both cases the topic at
>hand is proper use of povray.binaries.images. In any case, this is *your*
>"silly little argument". If you're so unhappy with the situation, *leave*.
>

Now you give the greater detail. Sheeh! Dear me. I think you need to
leave if you cannot get it right first time.

--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 22:42:17 +0000, IMBJR wrote:

> On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 17:30:38 -0500, Tyler Eaves <tyl### [at] NOSPAMml1net>
> wrote:
> 
>>How precisely is that out of context? I posted the entire quote. It was in
>>response to the following post by Rune:
>>
>>...or post images to p.b.i without any interest in getting feedback or
>>even if other people can see the images. I expect that we'll be seeing
>>quite some more JPEG2000 images there now - oops, "seeing" was not a
>>well chosen word... ;)
>>
>>I don't think it's at all "out of context", as in both cases the topic at
>>hand is proper use of povray.binaries.images. In any case, this is *your*
>>"silly little argument". If you're so unhappy with the situation, *leave*.
>>
> 
> Now you give the greater detail. Sheeh! Dear me. I think you need to
> leave if you cannot get it right first time.
> 

Wow, ad hominem arguments. Very professional and effective. So, now,
buddy, what exactly is your defense regarding your use of p.b.i?

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 17:40:08 -0500, Tyler Eaves <tyl### [at] NOSPAMml1net>
wrote:

>On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 22:42:17 +0000, IMBJR wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 17:30:38 -0500, Tyler Eaves <tyl### [at] NOSPAMml1net>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>>How precisely is that out of context? I posted the entire quote. It was in
>>>response to the following post by Rune:
>>>
>>>...or post images to p.b.i without any interest in getting feedback or
>>>even if other people can see the images. I expect that we'll be seeing
>>>quite some more JPEG2000 images there now - oops, "seeing" was not a
>>>well chosen word... ;)
>>>
>>>I don't think it's at all "out of context", as in both cases the topic at
>>>hand is proper use of povray.binaries.images. In any case, this is *your*
>>>"silly little argument". If you're so unhappy with the situation, *leave*.
>>>
>> 
>> Now you give the greater detail. Sheeh! Dear me. I think you need to
>> leave if you cannot get it right first time.
>> 
>
>Wow, ad hominem arguments. Very professional and effective. So, now,
>buddy, what exactly is your defense regarding your use of p.b.i?

As previously stated. Read up on it. Do I have to show you flash cards
like you were trying with me just now? 

"This is an apple. Apple. Repeat after me. Apple."

>

--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com

Post a reply to this message

IMBJR wrote:
> This is a newserver not a web server. Dear me, if this is how you
> start your rant you've already lost major respect-possibilities.

However, if they have but one server, using space on one resource
uses up the other's as well.  ;)

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 18:00:52 -0500, Tim Cook <z99### [at] bellsouthnet>
wrote:

>IMBJR wrote:
>> This is a newserver not a web server. Dear me, if this is how you
>> start your rant you've already lost major respect-possibilities.
>
>However, if they have but one server, using space on one resource
>uses up the other's as well.  ;)

The means and ways of how the servers work is unknown to me, but
referring to a webserver in the context of a USENET [1] discussion
shows typical ignorance for these parts.

[1] Ken! I've rang the bell - come pant for me!

--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 23:04:48 +0000, IMBJR wrote:

> As previously stated. Read up on it. Do I have to show you flash cards
> like you were trying with me just now? 
> 
> "This is an apple. Apple. Repeat after me. Apple."

State again, I sure can't seem to find it. Not that your arguments
actually make sense, are logically consistent, or in general show an great
deal of sanity.

Post a reply to this message

"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
news:euup401au6u37lrkgn8tad8lk88elcqh9r@4ax.com...

Would the admin please be kind enough to sent this turkey to the trash where
he belongs?  Posting in formats that most can't see and then saying it's the
fault of everyone else is rather discourteous, not to mention egotistical
and schizophrenic.

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 18:08:44 -0500, Tyler Eaves <tyl### [at] NOSPAMml1net>
wrote:

>On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 23:04:48 +0000, IMBJR wrote:
>
>> As previously stated. Read up on it. Do I have to show you flash cards
>> like you were trying with me just now? 
>> 
>> "This is an apple. Apple. Repeat after me. Apple."
>
>State again, I sure can't seem to find it. Not that your arguments
>actually make sense, are logically consistent, or in general show an great
>deal of sanity. 

Pay attention: APPLE. Repeat: APPLE.


--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com

Post a reply to this message