POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : JPEG2000 : Re: JPEG2000 Server Time
4 Aug 2024 12:15:58 EDT (-0400)
  Re: JPEG2000  
From: Tyler Eaves
Date: 8 Mar 2004 17:29:13
Message: <pan.2004.03.08.22.30.38.595535@NOSPAMml1.net>
On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 22:30:44 +0000, IMBJR wrote:

> On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 17:18:08 -0500, Tyler Eaves <tyl### [at] NOSPAMml1net>
> wrote:
> 
>>On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 22:17:00 +0000, IMBJR wrote:
>>
>>
>>> 
>>> What on Earth makes you think it is? My what twisted brain-spasm-logic
>>> came up with that idea?
>>> 
>>
>>
>>On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 20:39:54 +0000, IMBJR wrote:
>>
>>> Keep the fuck up. Did I not say elsewhere that if I wanted comments I
>>> would ask for them? I post them because I have something to post. This
>>> is a POV-Ray newserver is it not? I wish to let people look at my work
>>> if they so wish, I don't expect or require comments.
>>
>>Comments like that perhaps?
> 
> That's it, quote something out of context. Is that the way you try to
> win your silly little arguments? Dear me, it's pathetic, simply
> pathetic.

How precisely is that out of context? I posted the entire quote. It was in
response to the following post by Rune:

...or post images to p.b.i without any interest in getting feedback or
even if other people can see the images. I expect that we'll be seeing
quite some more JPEG2000 images there now - oops, "seeing" was not a
well chosen word... ;)

I don't think it's at all "out of context", as in both cases the topic at
hand is proper use of povray.binaries.images. In any case, this is *your*
"silly little argument". If you're so unhappy with the situation, *leave*.


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.