 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <jer### [at] netplex aussieorg> , Jerry
<jer### [at] acusdedu> wrote:
> An anchor needs a closing tag in the same way as <em> and <strong> need
> closing tags. There isn't any "implied ending" except perhaps at the end
> of a paragraph-level tag.
But then, why does Mozilla turn it into a *link*, inferring that it has a
"href" attribute while it does not? That is a bug!!! The standard is very
precise about the difference between "href" and "name" type a tags. The
"name" variant does behave like a destination, not an origin...
Thorsten
____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
e-mail: tho### [at] trfde
Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trfde> wrote:
>> With Mozilla I don't see any odd behaviour. None of the text is underlined
>> or anything else. Everything seems to work as it should.
> Not surprising as you alway place it at the end of a structure element.
> Even Mozilla isn't _that_ stupid!
I didn't understand. A short example would have been more clear.
--
#macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb M()}}
N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message news:3d3433e0@news.povray.org...
> Could someone give me a (small) example where the reported misbehaviour
> happens?
I'll see if I can restore a copy of the page where this was happening.
-- Chris
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 18:21:57 +0200, Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trfde> wrote:
> In article <jer### [at] netplexaussieorg> , Jerry
><jer### [at] acusdedu> wrote:
>> An anchor needs a closing tag in the same way as <em> and <strong> need
>> closing tags. There isn't any "implied ending" except perhaps at the end
>> of a paragraph-level tag.
>
> But then, why does Mozilla turn it into a *link*, inferring that it has a
> "href" attribute while it does not? That is a bug!!!
But it doesn't - I'm willing to bet all this whining is
because the attached CSS has "a { whatever-style: }"
instead of "a:link { whatever-style; }". At least that causes
the described behavior in 0.9.9.
Everyone, please stop whining about how the web, html
specs and browsers are broken; they have been that way
as long as they've existed and there will never be
a change to that. It sucks, but there's nothing anyone
can (or will) do about it - standard compliance or
unambiguous specifications just don't thrive in the
electronic world.
--
Antti Arola, edistyksenvastainen retropaskiainen
This message written by a complete asshole.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Antti Arola" <aea### [at] ioboxfi> wrote in message
news:slr### [at] skavaraese...
<snip>
Who is this Antti? How dare a sane person contribute to the discussion...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 20:46:31 +0100, Tom Melly <tom### [at] tomandlucouk> wrote:
> "Antti Arola" <aea### [at] ioboxfi> wrote in message
> news:slr### [at] skavaraese...
>
><snip>
>
> Who is this Antti?
I thought my sig said it all. I fully mean it. Dead serious.
That is also why I rather lurk.
> How dare a sane person contribute to the discussion...
Dunno. Maybe one of the sane participants would care to
comment?
--
Antti Arola, edistyksenvastainen retropaskiainen
This message written by a complete asshole.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <slr### [at] skavaraese> , Antti Arola <aea### [at] ioboxfi>
wrote:
> But it doesn't - I'm willing to bet all this whining is
> because the attached CSS has "a { whatever-style: }"
> instead of "a:link { whatever-style; }". At least that causes
> the described behavior in 0.9.9.
Nope, the stylesheet is correct. Mozilla is broken, or as they call it, it
has this "feature".
Thorsten
____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
e-mail: tho### [at] trfde
Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <slr### [at] skavaraese> , Antti Arola <aea### [at] ioboxfi>
wrote:
> Everyone, please stop whining about how the web, html
> specs and browsers are broken; they have been that way
> as long as they've existed and there will never be
> a change to that. It sucks, but there's nothing anyone
> can (or will) do about it - standard compliance or
> unambiguous specifications just don't thrive in the
> electronic world.
I liked HTML 2.0 + tables. It did everything it had to and it worked well.
In fact it still does.
Thorsten
____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
e-mail: tho### [at] trfde
Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 16 Jul 2002 16:08:29 -0400, Antti Arola wrote:
Antti Arola, edistyksenvastainen retropaskiainen
This message written by a complete asshole.
Your sig doesn't render in 3.5.
--
%HAV-A-NICEDAY email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
Steve web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
10:37pm up 19 days, 8:56, 1 user, load average: 1.02, 1.04, 1.00
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Chris Cason" <new### [at] deletethispovrayorg> wrote in message
news:3d345e3f@news.povray.org...
>
> "Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message news:3d3433e0@news.povray.org...
> > Could someone give me a (small) example where the reported misbehaviour
> > happens?
>
> I'll see if I can restore a copy of the page where this was happening.
http://www.povray.org/resources/newsgroups/old-oetut.html
For the effect to be visible, you need to have a style that applies an underline
(or whatever) for a 'hover' action. I'd presume that Mozilla is doing this all
the time, but it only ever becomes visible in cases like this.
I have deliberately added a </a> after the word 'this' in the first paragraph to
make it clear that the effect does indeed end when a </a> is found.
-- Chris
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
