 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
news:400e8c05@news.povray.org...
> Because nobody reads that group it seems. I am actually amazed how much
> stuff we could write there, and how many people ask without ever even
> checking that group ;-)
The only way would be to post really outrageous things there from time to
time, like :
"Microsoft's POV-Ray buyout: according to the software giant, the raytracer
will be made closed source and tightly integrated in Longhorn. All
non-Windows versions will be discontinued. Windows users will be amazed by
the long-expected Clippy primitive. Security patches to follow next. "
or
"POV-Ray will be used exclusively to render Finding Nemo 2, according to
Pixar insiders. This long-expected sequel will be released in 2072."
or
"NASA's Mars images were all faked with POV-Ray and we have the code,
nutcases claim on www.povrayconspiracies.com"
G.
--
**********************
http://www.oyonale.com
**********************
- Graphic experiments
- POV-Ray and Poser computer images
- Posters
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thorsten Froehlich" <tho### [at] trf de> wrote in
news:400e8c05@news.povray.org:
>
> Because nobody reads that group it seems.
My humblest apologies. I thought I was subscribed to that group, but I was
mistaken. The post has more information than I could have hoped for.
Thank you to the whole team
--
Tom
_________________________________
The Internet Movie Project
http://www.imp.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 17:24:30 +0100, "Gilles Tran" <tra### [at] inapginrafr> wrote:
> "Microsoft's POV-Ray buyout: according to the software giant, the raytracer
> will be made closed source and tightly integrated in Longhorn. All
> non-Windows versions will be discontinued. Windows users will be amazed by
> the long-expected Clippy primitive. Security patches to follow next. "
"SCO: the same lines of code has been found in POV-Ray for Linux and POV-Ray
for Windows. Intrigued David Buck spend whole night restoring his backups:
<<All my rays were sended from Amiga>>"
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gilles Tran wrote:
> "NASA's Mars images were all faked with POV-Ray and we have the code,
> nutcases claim on www.povrayconspiracies.com"
But that one's true...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> "NASA's Mars images were all faked with POV-Ray and we have the code,
> nutcases claim on www.povrayconspiracies.com"
I can't believe it: I actually clicked on that link...
Severi
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
ABX <abx### [at] abxartpl> wrote in news:hu2t00t17obomm55pmhhndmsqhos5ksa7p@
4ax.com:
>
>> but will it have
>> "Pause Rendering" on the right click menu of the system tray icon?
>
> Sounds reasonable. I will look at it and try to simplify Chris work with
> pleasing you, thought who knows how complicated it will be.
>
> ABX
Thanks. Even if it does not make it in, I am sure that I will still be
delighted with 3.6. The status report had many good things, that I figured
were still quite a few years out.
--
Tom
_________________________________
The Internet Movie Project
http://www.imp.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <400e8c05@news.povray.org>, tho### [at] trfde says...
> In article <400e8703@news.povray.org> , "Gilles Tran" <tra### [at] inapginrafr>
> wrote:
>
> > Only the POV-Gods know... but there's a message posted 3 days ago on
> > povray.announce.FAQ that didn't get the publicity it deserves ;-)
>
> Because nobody reads that group it seems. I am actually amazed how much
> stuff we could write there, and how many people ask without ever even
> checking that group ;-) In fact, I was waiting if somebody would notice -
> but you already knew, of course...
Objection!
I read it.
Well, when I say 'read it', I read the few and infrequent messages
posted there. I caught the recent post, but since I'm not doing much
(if any) POV ATM, it didn't really affect me, and so I carried on as
normal, quite happy to let the POV team get on with what they do.
:P
:)
Jamie.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tom Melly wrote:
> Is there to be any public discussion regarding what makes it into 3.6?
No, it is still essentially a bug fix release. The operational differences
are minor at best and feature development beyond what is already included
should be considered locked.
--
Ken Tyler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Don't wake sleeping animals, I am still waiting for the next "let's
> start a POV 4.0 discussion" thread to be started despite that.
Hmmmm...
But when is v4.0 going to be released by the way ???
...
:-)
...
Nooo !! NNoooOOOO !!! Don't beat me !! It was just a joke !!!
JC
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"JC (Exether)" <no### [at] spamfr> wrote in message news:400ffdf7$1@news.povray.org...
>
> Nooo !! NNoooOOOO !!! Don't beat me !! It was just a joke !!!
Just be grateful you didn't make it in Miami. Take him away. See the judge
Monday.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
