 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi Folks,
I've read in povray.bugreports,
message title: Crash in POV-Ray 3.5 Windows (number overflow??)
...that there is a 3.51 version of POV-Ray, is this correct?
If so, is it available for D/L.
Thanks.
--
(MIKA) Marc Champagne
marcch.AT.videotron.DOT.ca
Montreal, CANADA
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Marc Champagne wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> I've read in povray.bugreports,
> message title: Crash in POV-Ray 3.5 Windows (number overflow??)
>
> ...that there is a 3.51 version of POV-Ray, is this correct?
>
> If so, is it available for D/L.
POV-Ray v3.51 has not yet been released to the public. There is no public
release date available at this time.
--
Ken Tyler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Marc Champagne" <nos### [at] please com> wrote in message
news:Xns### [at] 204213191226...
>
> I've read in povray.bugreports,
> message title: Crash in POV-Ray 3.5 Windows (number overflow??)
>
> ...that there is a 3.51 version of POV-Ray, is this correct?
>
> If so, is it available for D/L.
Sorry Marc, it's only in the hands of the developers ATM. Still a WIP, I
couldn't tell you anything more. And, as you see from my other reply to your
other recent message, the documentation is in the same state.
Probably won't do any good to ask when it will be available, so please try
as much as possible to refrain from doing so (everyone). :-)
Not a POV-TAG member:
Bob H.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Hughes, B." <omn### [at] charternet> wrote in
news:3f4024e4$1@news.povray.org:
> "Marc Champagne" <nos### [at] pleasecom> wrote in message
> news:Xns### [at] 204213191226...
>>
>> I've read in povray.bugreports,
>> message title: Crash in POV-Ray 3.5 Windows (number overflow??)
>>
>> ...that there is a 3.51 version of POV-Ray, is this correct?
>>
>> If so, is it available for D/L.
>
> Sorry Marc, it's only in the hands of the developers ATM. Still a WIP, I
> couldn't tell you anything more. And, as you see from my other reply to
> your other recent message, the documentation is in the same state.
>
> Probably won't do any good to ask when it will be available, so please
> try as much as possible to refrain from doing so (everyone). :-)
I won't be asking, I'm sure it'll be announced in due time, I just though
I had missed something important... like a new version :)
Merci
--
(MIKA) Marc Champagne
marcch.AT.videotron.DOT.ca
Montreal, CANADA
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The Mac 3.5.1 RC2 is out... Is there a patch you can try for
unofficial builds? I clicked around absently but didn't find
anything.
I came up with a work around for my 3.5 bug question
(http://news.povray.org/povray.general/32820/) so I'm somewhat
less interested in 3.5.1 today.
Just curious about possibly finding a patch...
In article <3F4023F5.A95CBD82@pacbell.net>, Ken wrote:
> POV-Ray v3.51 has not yet been released to the public. There is no public
> release date available at this time.
--
If riding in an airplane is flying, then riding in a boat is swimming.
41 jumps, 8.9 minutes of freefall, 19.2 ff vertical miles.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Probably won't do any good to ask when it will be available, so please try
> as much as possible to refrain from doing so (everyone). :-)
I'm not gonna ask when its available. But can I ask what new features we can
expect?
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.493 / Virus Database: 292 - Release Date: 6/25/2003
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3f426d30@news.povray.org> , "Corey" <sch### [at] hotmailcom>
wrote:
> I'm not gonna ask when its available. But can I ask what new features we can
> expect?
Huh??? We are talking about POV-Ray 3.5.1 here!
Thorsten
____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
e-mail: tho### [at] trfde
Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thorsten Froehlich" <tho### [at] trfde> wrote in message
news:3f4294d2$1@news.povray.org...
>
> > I'm not gonna ask when its available. But can I ask what new features we
can
> > expect?
>
> Huh??? We are talking about POV-Ray 3.5.1 here!
There are several fixes and changes, some additions. Would it be wise, or
unwise, to post my much-condensed list here? I couldn't make a judgement
call on this alone but I realize it might also help people know what to
expect instead of conjecture what the "bug-fix" 3.5.1 (sorry, it surely is
not sub-number 51! ;-)) will be about.
Or should we even be here talking of it at all??
Bob H.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3f42aff8@news.povray.org> , "Hughes, B." <omn### [at] charternet>
wrote:
> There are several fixes and changes
Actually, I tried to make clear that there are no new features for very
obvious reasons. And the poster I replied to should really have understood
that from the version number.
> Or should we even be here talking of it at all??
No. There is no final list of changes until there is a final version. Once
there is, there will be an official list.
Thorsten
____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich
e-mail: mac### [at] povrayorg
I am a member of the POV-Ray Team.
Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 07:55:15 +0200, "Thorsten Froehlich" <tho### [at] trfde>
wrote:
> And the poster I replied to should really have understood
> that from the version number.
That's obvious for you, not for everybody. For those who are not familar with
numbering systems 3.5.1 means nothing but "new version" could mean variety of
things like bugfixes, better documentation structure, nice manual in PDF,
updated scene files, new installers on some platforms, new icons, rewritten
parts because of copyrights, updated 3rd party libraries, extension to 64bit
platforms, better function VM etc, etc. Whatever 3.5.1 is, it is somehow newer
version and there is no need to know numbering system to ask about it within
community, imo. I don't see any reason why average Windows user should know
numbering system like described at http://www.advogato.org/article/40.html -
so no need to overwhelm user.
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
