 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I wonder if sphere sweep could be defined (in sdl) similiar to blob - with
spheres as components. If sphere_sweep intersection test can calculate radius
for specified intersection then it means it knows t value between noodes. If it
knows t value then it can average pigments of noodes. Probably best explanation
what I mean could be syntax example. I mean something like:
sphere_sweep{
linear_spline
sphere{<0,1,2> .1}
sphere{<0,1,2> .2 pigment{red 1}}
sphere{<7,6,6> .3 pigment{green 1}}
sphere{<0,1,2> .4}
sphere{<0,1,2> .5}
pigment{blue 1}
}
Above example creates 4 segments - first goes from blue to red, second goes from
red to green, third goes from green to blue, fourth is completly blue.
Definetly something to try after source release.
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Not only. It would be great if you could scale each sphere and get the scaling
interpolated (for flat wires).
--
Jonathan.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
wrote:
> I wonder if sphere sweep could be defined (in sdl) similiar to blob
Interesting. How about turning it into a blob completely, you could do
stuff like in Softy3D.
http://www.softy3d.com/en/index.htm
Ingo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I've just spent about 10 minutes trying to find this message. Anyway, see
p.b.i..
-Shay
JRG <jrg### [at] hotmail com> wrote in message news:3ca4adbc@news.povray.org...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 29 Mar 2002 15:24:18 -0500, ingo <ing### [at] homenl> wrote:
> Interesting. How about turning it into a blob completely, you could do
> stuff like in Softy3D.
It could be two implementation of sphere sweeps as for sphere and cylinder - as
separated object and as blob component. Moreover with changed inside definition
as I proposed some day it could be probably possible to add every object type as
blob component - then blob would be something like bridge between unions and
isosurfaces.
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002 14:10:51 -0600, "Shay" <sah### [at] simcopartscom> wrote:
> I've just spent about 10 minutes trying to find this message. Anyway, see
> p.b.i..
?
nothing related
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
news:qujiau4fm40ter5dhrl63htrl425e350nj@4ax.com...
> ?
>
> nothing related
>
> ABX
I should have quoted JRG's message in my reply. I posted an image in p.b.i.
of flat wire. JRG had mentioned it in his reply to your original post.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
W"odzimierz ABX Skiba <abx### [at] babilonorg> wrote:
> Above example creates 4 segments - first goes from blue to red, second
> goes from red to green, third goes from green to blue, fourth is completly
> blue.
Should be not much of a problem, because just like the x, y, and z
coordinates and the position along the curve, the color could be
parametrized. One implementation problem may be the current separation
between the geometry (shape) and the surface properties (texture etc.).
> Definetly something to try after source release.
If someone is bold enough to figure out the source code... 8)
Jochen Lippert
--
No smilies were harmed in the making of this message ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
