 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2/18/2016 3:38 AM, Sven Littkowski wrote:
> I have a tiny mini scene, but it takes forever to render it. Wow.
>
> Please let me know, how long this scene needs on your computer.
>
> 800x600, AA 0.3, highest quality, radiosity settings as defined inside
> the scene.
Two minutes 30 seconds in an i7 machine 12 threads.
Two minutes 24 seconds +BS8
Two minutes 24 seconds +BS16
Three minutes 7 seconds +BS64
Two minutes 20 seconds +BS8 Priority high (PovRay) display closed.
Two minutes 21 seconds +BS8 Priority high (PovRay) display open.
Two minutes 20 seconds +BS8 Priority high (PovRay) Priority Realtime
(Windows) display open.
Two minutes 23 seconds +BS8 Priority Normal (PovRay) Priority Realtime
(Windows) display closed.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I have a tiny mini scene, but it takes forever to render it. Wow.
>
> Please let me know, how long this scene needs on your computer.
>
> 800x600, AA 0.3, highest quality, radiosity settings as defined inside
> the scene.
Spot on 2 mins 30 s here too, I just chose 800x600 AA0.3 from the menu
and hit Run (no command line options). Xeon E5-1650
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks to everyone. In my case, over 30 minutes. Don't know, why. My
machine is slower, but it shouldn't be thaaat slow.
Can you post these images inside the image section? Thanks.
-------------------------------------
On 17.02.2016 22:38, Sven Littkowski wrote:
> Please let me know, how long this scene needs on your computer.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Thanks to everyone. In my case, over 30 minutes. Don't know, why. My
> machine is slower, but it shouldn't be thaaat slow.
What CPU is it?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sven Littkowski <jam### [at] yahoo com> wrote:
>
> Please let me know, how long this scene needs on your computer.
>
> 800x600, AA 0.3, highest quality, radiosity settings as defined inside
> the scene.
>
Just as a point of reference:
On my old but trusty Windows XP machine (single-core, 32-bit, with AMD Athlon64
3400 processor but running in 32-bit mode) and using the latest v3.71
'development build'...
55 min 45 sec
OOOH, that's sad. And embarrassing. :-O
Maybe if I used TWO Windows XP machines... (ha!)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 18/02/2016 04:38, Sven Littkowski a écrit :
> I have a tiny mini scene, but it takes forever to render it. Wow.
>
> Please let me know, how long this scene needs on your computer.
>
> 800x600, AA 0.3, highest quality, radiosity settings as defined inside
> the scene.
i7 980 (3.33GHz), 6 cores+HT
-Itime.pov +H600 +W800 +A0.3 +WT12
Radiosity Time: 0 hours 2 minutes 15 seconds (135.492 seconds)
using 12 thread(s) with 1489.054 CPU-seconds total
Trace Time: 0 hours 0 minutes 29 seconds (29.746 seconds)
using 12 thread(s) with 274.329 CPU-seconds total
Percent of CPU this job got: 1061%
Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 2:46.12
Maximum resident set size (kbytes): 69328
-Itime.pov +H600 +W800 +A0.3 +WT6
(only true cores)
Radiosity Time: 0 hours 2 minutes 34 seconds (154.453 seconds)
using 6 thread(s) with 896.823 CPU-seconds total
Trace Time: 0 hours 0 minutes 36 seconds (36.837 seconds)
using 6 thread(s) with 188.611 CPU-seconds total
Percent of CPU this job got: 565%
Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 3:12.16
Maximum resident set size (kbytes): 49616
-Itime.pov +H600 +W800 +A0.3 +WT1
Radiosity Time: 0 hours 14 minutes 42 seconds (882.553 seconds)
using 1 thread(s) with 882.539 CPU-seconds total
Trace Time: 0 hours 3 minutes 6 seconds (186.465 seconds)
using 1 thread(s) with 186.457 CPU-seconds total
Percent of CPU this job got: 100%
Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 17:49.93
Maximum resident set size (kbytes): 38160
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'time.png' (62 KB)
Preview of image 'time.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 18.02.2016 um 18:38 schrieb Le_Forgeron:
> [...image...]
Tsk, tsk... you should know better than to post images here ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I want to express my honest big thanks to all of you here. There is
really a very great spirit in this group, and I like it very much. My
appreciation to everyone.
Some of you get really amazing speeds, I can only dream about it. :-D
On 17.02.2016 22:38, Sven Littkowski wrote:
> Please let me know, how long this scene needs on your computer.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2/18/2016 8:51 PM, Sven Littkowski wrote:
> I want to express my honest big thanks to all of you here. There is
> really a very great spirit in this group, and I like it very much. My
> appreciation to everyone.
>
</boak>
> Some of you get really amazing speeds, I can only dream about it.:-D
>
I've used a laptop for about ten years and was was very pleased when I
could get a PC. Laptops are limited by comparison, a fact of life. :-(
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yes, sooo true.
On 18.02.2016 16:52, Stephen wrote:
> I've used a laptop for about ten years and was was very pleased when I
> could get a PC. Laptops are limited by comparison, a fact of life. :-(
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
