 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I will post the macros on "povray.binaries.scene-files"
Done.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Why use POV to composite images. I know it can be done. POV is a programming
system. The raytracer proved that. POV was not written to be a image
processing system. You should find a program that is intended for this
purpose. If you want to do post production with out paying for it just use
imagemagik. Works wonderfully.
It is available on both windows and Linux and I am sure for the MAC as well.
"Christopher James Huff" <cja### [at] earthlink net> wrote in message
news:cja### [at] netplexaussieorg...
> In article <3fefaf9e@news.povray.org>, "Slime" <fak### [at] emailaddress>
> wrote:
>
> > > You can't. POV is a 3D rendering program, not a 2D compositing tool.
> >
> > Well, technically, you could. It wouldn't be entirely easy, but
certainly
> > possible. With an orthographic camera and some planes in front of it,
each
> > with a texture map and a set transparency, in theory I think it could be
> > done. It might even be possible to write a macro which takes a base
filename
> > and a number of frames and averages the given files.
>
> No, you can't. He specifically said (emphasis mine):
>
> > So how I can post-process several frames together, *efficiently*, just
with
> > POV?.
>
> You only need one plane (a box would probably be better) with an average
> texture...but it is far from efficient.
>
> --
> Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
> POV-Ray TAG: <chr### [at] tagpovrayorg>
> http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I'll try, thanks.. I was browsing for hours and couldn't find anything
useful.. If this program can do batch-processing and script various
processes, I'll be delighted.
I just had a look.. Seems like a library of DOS tools? :-/
Regards,
Hugo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Among other things, Hugo Asm wrote:
> I'll try, thanks.. I was browsing for hours and couldn't find anything
> useful.. If this program can do batch-processing and script various
> processes, I'll be delighted.
>
> I just had a look.. Seems like a library of DOS tools? :-/
Well, it's a set of command-line programs, you don't need a GUI for
batch-processing ;)
I believe The Gimp has scripting and batch-processing too, and there's a
windows version (I don't know abut Mac).
--
light_source{9+9*x,1}camera{orthographic look_at(1-y)/4angle 30location
9/4-z*4}light_source{-9*z,1}union{box{.9-z.1+x clipped_by{plane{2+y-4*x
0}}}box{z-y-.1.1+z}box{-.1.1+x}box{.1z-.1}pigment{rgb<.8.2,1>}}//Jellby
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Well, it's a set of command-line programs, you don't need a GUI for
> batch-processing ;)
Maybe I'll try them but it seems my macros are simpler to use although they
render slower. Have I told you that I've use POV-macros to make html files?
I downloaded a few freeware html-applications to use when notepad fails, but
I end up using POV instead...
Regards
Hugo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
There's also the Java Advanced Imaging API (JAI). You can easily take a
bunch of images and average the pixles together yourself if you had to.
Andrew Wilcox
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jellby" <jel### [at] M-yahoocom> wrote in message
news:3ff0624e@news.povray.org...
>
> I believe The Gimp has scripting and batch-processing too, and there's a
> windows version (I don't know abut Mac).
? Doesn't the linux distrib of the Gimp run on a Mac ?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> I believe The Gimp has scripting and batch-processing too, and there's a
>> windows version (I don't know abut Mac).
>
> ? Doesn't the linux distrib of the Gimp run on a Mac ?
The original X11 version of Gimp runs on Mac OS X. I've never heard of a
version with a native interface, or one for Mac OS <= 9.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3ff143a7$1@news.povray.org>,
"Tom Melly" <tom### [at] tomandlucouk> wrote:
> ? Doesn't the linux distrib of the Gimp run on a Mac ?
Yes and no...Apple has an X11 environment which the Gimp can be compiled
to run under. There may be some modifications necessary to compile it on
Mac OS X, and a Linux binary certainly won't run on the Mac. Imagemagik
also runs under OS X, as well as the NetPBM utilities, which could also
be used for this purpose.
--
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: <chr### [at] tagpovrayorg>
http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
BAT files in windows works well for me. Linux I am sure is better but I have
too many programs I use in windows. You could use povray to output the BAT
files to be used with imagemagik.
"Hugo Asm" <hua### [at] post3teledk> wrote in message
news:3ff086bc@news.povray.org...
> > Well, it's a set of command-line programs, you don't need a GUI for
> > batch-processing ;)
>
> Maybe I'll try them but it seems my macros are simpler to use although
they
> render slower. Have I told you that I've use POV-macros to make html
files?
> I downloaded a few freeware html-applications to use when notepad fails,
but
> I end up using POV instead...
>
> Regards
> Hugo
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
