On 2 Jul 2002 15:18:32 -0400, Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> Greg M. Johnson <gregj;-)565### [at] aolco:-(m> wrote:
> > . . .  is now open.
> > http://10best.raytrace.com/short2/shortvote2.html
>
>   Would it be possible that next time you could use some smarter program
> to reduce the size of the images (for the thumbnails)? It looks like the
> program you used reduced the images simply by dropping rows and columns
> of pixels, which is not really nice.
>   The images with most little details suffer the most from this. They end
> up looking like random noise.

You are right. I missed this during conversion. I had no scope on thubnail
smoothing since I had already set Lanczos filter in my IrfanView. Looks like
batch converting in IrfanView has no setup for resize filter so I assume it
should get the same as for normal converting. But it doasn't. Greg I will
upload zip with correct thubnails after ten minutes at the same place as
previously.

ABX

Post a reply to this message

Should be fixed in an hour or so.
Q: are the 800's the best they can be??

Post a reply to this message

Greg M. Johnson <gregj;-)565### [at] aolco:-(m> wrote:
> Q: are the 800's the best they can be??

  I would have made my images a LOT better, but with only 500 bytes available
it's not easy... ;)

-- 
#macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb M()}}
N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}//  - Warp -

Post a reply to this message

Errr,  I mean is the render-quality of the 800's ok: I don't mean technical
merit and all that.............

Post a reply to this message

Greg M. Johnson <gregj;-)565### [at] aolco:-(m> wrote:
> Errr,  I mean is the render-quality of the 800's ok: I don't mean technical
> merit and all that.............

  I knew that.

-- 
#macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb M()}}
N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}//  - Warp -

Post a reply to this message

Aaah.  Some versions of IE will squish an image down to fit the browser
window if they are larger than the size it wants to give them.  The
squishing is apparently "AA 0.0."

Post a reply to this message

Greg M. Johnson <gregj:-)56590@ao:-)l.com> wrote:
> Aaah.  Some versions of IE will squish an image down to fit the browser
> window if they are larger than the size it wants to give them.  The
> squishing is apparently "AA 0.0."

  Which is, of course, another braindead idea from MS.
  I suppose that it can be turned off...

-- 
#macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb x]
[1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
-1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// - Warp -

Post a reply to this message

yep.  This makes a *big* difference for one of the entries, but I won't say
which one...

Post a reply to this message

Warp wrote:
> 
> Greg M. Johnson <gregj:-)56590@ao:-)l.com> wrote:
> > Aaah.  Some versions of IE will squish an image down to fit the browser
> > window if they are larger than the size it wants to give them.  The
> > squishing is apparently "AA 0.0."
> 
>   Which is, of course, another braindead idea from MS.
>   I suppose that it can be turned off...

If someone knows how let me know.

-- 
Ken Tyler

Post a reply to this message

"Ken" <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote :
>
> If someone knows how let me know.

    Yes. I know how.

Post a reply to this message