POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : Bug in (Mega)POV for Windows? Server Time
8 Aug 2024 14:24:43 EDT (-0400)
  Bug in (Mega)POV for Windows? (Message 1 to 8 of 8)  
From: Francois Labreque
Subject: Bug in (Mega)POV for Windows?
Date: 26 Dec 2000 17:09:50
Message: <3A491638.A7BF70DE@videotron.ca>
The syntax highlighter used in the various versions of POV for windows
thinks atan() is a valid function.

Have I discovered a new bug?  Should I post to povray.bugreports?

-- 
Francois Labreque | Rimmer: "Let's go to red alert!"
    flabreque     | Kryten: "Are you sure, Sir?  You realize it
        @         |          actually means changing the bulb!"
   videotron.ca


Post a reply to this message

From: Jonathan Rafael Ghiglia
Subject: Re: Bug in (Mega)POV for Windows?
Date: 26 Dec 2000 17:49:44
Message: <3A491F7D.51CF789A@libero.it>
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Try to post it to povray.unofficial.patches...
<p>Francois Labreque wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>The syntax highlighter used in the various versions
of POV for windows
<br>thinks atan() is a valid function.
<p>Have I discovered a new bug?  Should I post to povray.bugreports?
<p>--
<br>Francois Labreque | Rimmer: "Let's go to red alert!"
<br>    flabreque     | Kryten: "Are
you sure, Sir?  You realize it
<br>       
@        
|          actually means
changing the bulb!"
<br>   videotron.ca</blockquote>
</html>


Post a reply to this message

From: Chris Colefax
Subject: Re: Bug in (Mega)POV for Windows?
Date: 26 Dec 2000 17:51:06
Message: <3a4920da@news.povray.org>
Francois Labreque <fla### [at] videotronca> wrote:
> The syntax highlighter used in the various versions of POV for windows
> thinks atan() is a valid function.
>
> Have I discovered a new bug?  Should I post to povray.bugreports?

No - atan() *is* invalid.  POV-Ray 3.1 only supports the atan2() function,
with instructions in the docs to use atan2(A, 1) if you want something that
acts like regular atan().


Post a reply to this message

From: Francois Labreque
Subject: Re: Bug in (Mega)POV for Windows?
Date: 26 Dec 2000 18:12:45
Message: <3A4924F6.743B2D65@videotron.ca>
Chris Colefax wrote:
> 
> Francois Labreque <fla### [at] videotronca> wrote:
> > The syntax highlighter used in the various versions of POV for windows
> > thinks atan() is a valid function.
> >
> > Have I discovered a new bug?  Should I post to povray.bugreports?
> 
> No - atan() *is* invalid.  POV-Ray 3.1 only supports the atan2() function,
> with instructions in the docs to use atan2(A, 1) if you want something that
> acts like regular atan().

I know this, but atan() is highlighted in purple as if it were a valid
keyword.  Hence my question.

However, I think this is a problem with the Codemax editor, not the
POV-Ray (or MegaPOV) program.  Hence my asking if I should post my bug
report to p.br.

-- 
Francois Labreque | Rimmer: "Let's go to red alert!"
    flabreque     | Kryten: "Are you sure, Sir?  You realize it
        @         |          actually means changing the bulb!"
   videotron.ca


Post a reply to this message

From: Chris Colefax
Subject: Re: Bug in (Mega)POV for Windows?
Date: 26 Dec 2000 18:19:16
Message: <3a492774@news.povray.org>
Francois Labreque <fla### [at] videotronca> wrote:
> I know this, but atan() is highlighted in purple as if it were a valid
> keyword.  Hence my question.
>
> However, I think this is a problem with the Codemax editor, not the
> POV-Ray (or MegaPOV) program.  Hence my asking if I should post my bug
> report to p.br.

Mea culpa - I read your original message back to front!  So, I guess I
should reply back to front as well - a quick perusal of the MegaPOV docs
reveals that atan() *is* valid in isosurfaces, so it would appear that it's
not a bug when using the editor with MegaPOV...


Post a reply to this message

From: Francois Labreque
Subject: Re: Bug in (Mega)POV for Windows?
Date: 26 Dec 2000 20:16:44
Message: <3A494289.DF38854B@videotron.ca>
Chris Colefax wrote:
> 
> Francois Labreque <fla### [at] videotronca> wrote:
> > I know this, but atan() is highlighted in purple as if it were a valid
> > keyword.  Hence my question.
> >
> > However, I think this is a problem with the Codemax editor, not the
> > POV-Ray (or MegaPOV) program.  Hence my asking if I should post my bug
> > report to p.br.
> 
> Mea culpa - I read your original message back to front!  So, I guess I
> should reply back to front as well - a quick perusal of the MegaPOV docs
> reveals that atan() *is* valid in isosurfaces, so it would appear that it's
> not a bug when using the editor with MegaPOV...

But... but... but... it also does it with P.O.V. (Plain Ol' Vanilla) POV
as well!!!

-- 
Francois Labreque | Rimmer: "Let's go to red alert!"
    flabreque     | Kryten: "Are you sure, Sir?  You realize it
        @         |          actually means changing the bulb!"
   videotron.ca


Post a reply to this message

From: John VanSickle
Subject: Re: Bug in (Mega)POV for Windows?
Date: 27 Dec 2000 01:52:08
Message: <3A49A62E.1349BB6F@erols.com>
Francois Labreque wrote:
> 
> Chris Colefax wrote:
> >
> > Francois Labreque <fla### [at] videotronca> wrote:
> > > I know this, but atan() is highlighted in purple as if it were a
> > > valid keyword.  Hence my question.
> > >
> > > However, I think this is a problem with the Codemax editor, not
> > > the POV-Ray (or MegaPOV) program.  Hence my asking if I should
> > > post my bug report to p.br.
> >
> > Mea culpa - I read your original message back to front!  So, I
> > guess I should reply back to front as well - a quick perusal of the
> > MegaPOV docs reveals that atan() *is* valid in isosurfaces, so it
> > would appear that it's not a bug when using the editor with
> > MegaPOV...
> 
> But... but... but... it also does it with P.O.V. (Plain Ol' Vanilla) POV
> as well!!!

The atan keyword (without parentheses) can be used in the julia object
in the official version.

Regards,
John


Post a reply to this message

From: Francois Labreque
Subject: Re: Bug in (Mega)POV for Windows?
Date: 27 Dec 2000 08:22:45
Message: <3A49ECAE.6A3BA29@videotron.ca>
John VanSickle wrote:
> 
> Francois Labreque wrote:
> >
> > Chris Colefax wrote:
> > >
> > > Francois Labreque <fla### [at] videotronca> wrote:
> > > > I know this, but atan() is highlighted in purple as if it were a
> > > > valid keyword.  Hence my question.
> > > >
> > > > However, I think this is a problem with the Codemax editor, not
> > > > the POV-Ray (or MegaPOV) program.  Hence my asking if I should
> > > > post my bug report to p.br.
> > >
> > > Mea culpa - I read your original message back to front!  So, I
> > > guess I should reply back to front as well - a quick perusal of the
> > > MegaPOV docs reveals that atan() *is* valid in isosurfaces, so it
> > > would appear that it's not a bug when using the editor with
> > > MegaPOV...
> >
> > But... but... but... it also does it with P.O.V. (Plain Ol' Vanilla) POV
> > as well!!!
> 
> The atan keyword (without parentheses) can be used in the julia object
> in the official version.

Oh!  I did not know that!

-- 
Francois Labreque | Rimmer: "Let's go to red alert!"
    flabreque     | Kryten: "Are you sure, Sir?  You realize it
        @         |          actually means changing the bulb!"
   videotron.ca


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.