 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
there was once talk about a new web site.
It was previewed, and ever since i never heard of it anymore.
What's up?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> there was once talk about a new web site.
> It was previewed, and ever since i never heard of it anymore.
>
> What's up?
>
>
I am sure the 3.5 Beta has nothing to do with it...
:-)
Tom
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tom Galvin <tom### [at] dataforge nospamcom> wrote:
> I am sure the 3.5 Beta has nothing to do with it...
They say patience is a virtue...
--
#macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb M()}}
N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002 01:47:00 +0200, "ncryptor" <o### [at] ocom> wrote:
> there was once talk about a new web site.
> It was previewed, and ever since i never heard of it anymore.
> What's up?
must be at
http://web.archive.org/web/19980704224826/http://www.povray.org/
;-)
some other updates of povray.org:
http://web.archive.org/web/19961221034642/http://www.povray.org/
http://web.archive.org/web/19971212011214/http://www.povray.org/
http://web.archive.org/web/20000620135821/http://www.povray.org/
http://web.archive.org/web/20010228013458/http://www.povray.org/ :-)
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
ncryptor wrote:
>
> there was once talk about a new web site.
> It was previewed, and ever since i never heard of it anymore.
Many of us pointed out that the old site wasn't broken.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
John VanSickle wrote:
>ncryptor wrote:
>
>
>>there was once talk about a new web site.
>>It was previewed, and ever since i never heard of it anymore.
>>
>>
>
>Many of us pointed out that the old site wasn't broken.
>
>
That it wasn't broken? Well, good lord, I have a 386 that isn't
broken...but that didn't stop me from putting it up on my wall for all
to see. I rather enjoyed the newer site myself - especially the
consolidation of povray.org/links into the main povray site...very nice,
and updated. Perhaps if the pov-team does not like to update the site
much they ought to let someone who does do it? (Not a flame, I promise,
just a suggestion - I know they are REALLY busy).
My Two Cents,
Tim S.
--
/~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\
| Tim Soderstrom |
| Mig### [at] mailutexasedu |
| http://www.crosswinds.net/~mightytim |
| |
| "Life is like a box of chocolates - never know what you gonna get" |
| -Forrest Gump |
\ /
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
TigerHawk wrote:
>
> John VanSickle wrote:
>
> >ncryptor wrote:
> >
> >
> >>there was once talk about a new web site.
> >>It was previewed, and ever since i never heard of it anymore.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Many of us pointed out that the old site wasn't broken.
> >
> >
> That it wasn't broken? Well, good lord, I have a 386 that isn't
> broken...but that didn't stop me from putting it up on my wall for all
> to see. I rather enjoyed the newer site myself - especially the
> consolidation of povray.org/links into the main povray site...very nice,
> and updated. Perhaps if the pov-team does not like to update the site
> much they ought to let someone who does do it? (Not a flame, I promise,
> just a suggestion - I know they are REALLY busy).
And as Warp said "They say patience is a virtue...".
--
Ken Tyler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Ken" <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in message news:3D2### [at] pacbellnet...
> And as Warp said "They say patience is a virtue...".
Indeed. I'd say that once POV-Ray 3.5 is out, there is a vague possibility that I
or some other team member may feel inclined to update the site. The problem is, of
course, that last time that this happened, virtually all we got was complaints. The
current site is functional, and serves a purpose, which is what really matters, IMO.
Perhaps this thread could end now ... (hint).
-- Chris
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
