POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : Radiosity champions, here's something for you ! Server Time
7 Aug 2024 17:24:32 EDT (-0400)
  Radiosity champions, here's something for you ! (Message 71 to 74 of 74)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: JRG
Subject: Re: Radiosity champions, here's something for you !
Date: 25 Dec 2001 15:37:24
Message: <3c28e384@news.povray.org>
I like it, but the atmospheric effect is a bit too strong, IMO. I would use
less bright scattering and maybe some perturbation (read: turbulated bozo in
density color map). What your entry lacks is contrast to me. You're using
assumed_gamma 1, aren't you? Now, I know it's considered a *must have* for
realistic lighting scenes, but I personally could never get good contrasts
with it. Instead of playing with radiosity settings or light_sources, I
would slightly increase the assumed_gamma (1.1,1.2,1.3,1.4...) until you get
a good contrast (the lit parts should be a bit brighter and the shadowed
parts a bit darker IMO).
Other than that... 5 hours?! Hey, you could try and use better radiosity
settings, couldn't you? ;-)

--
Jonathan.

"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:3c28db0d@news.povray.org...
>   I made a third entry to the competition. Check it out.
>
> --
> #macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb
M()}}
> N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
> N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}//  -
Warp -


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Radiosity champions, here's something for you !
Date: 25 Dec 2001 16:10:20
Message: <3c28eb3c@news.povray.org>
JRG <jrg### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
: I like it, but the atmospheric effect is a bit too strong, IMO.

  I noticed that too, but not until the image was half-done. I was too lazy
to start over. It looked ok in a small image...

: Other than that... 5 hours?! Hey, you could try and use better radiosity
: settings, couldn't you? ;-)

  I could, but then I would probably get splotchiness, which would make it
look bad.

-- 
#macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb M()}}
N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}//  - Warp -


Post a reply to this message

From: JRG
Subject: Re: Radiosity champions, here's something for you !
Date: 25 Dec 2001 16:18:11
Message: <3c28ed13@news.povray.org>
JRG wrote:
>You're using
> assumed_gamma 1, aren't you?

Oops, forget it. I've just downloaded your scene and you're not using
assumed_gamma at all.

--
Jonathan.


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Radiosity champions, here's something for you !
Date: 21 Jan 2002 20:18:44
Message: <3c4cbdf4@news.povray.org>
Btw, someone else has made a couple of povray entries to the competition.

  They look quite good, although the lighting is a bit "washed out" and lacks
a bit of depth (probably because he used max_recursion 1 and brightness 7).
Still great entries. They really help removing the bad fame povray has
among "pros".

-- 
#macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb M()}}
N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}//  - Warp -


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.