|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Fabien Mosen wrote in message <3b9efbef@news.povray.org>...
>There should maybe be a feature (set by default) to automatically adjust
>the rendering area to the camera's aspect ratio. I can't think of any
>situation where it would be problematic.
I see one possible problem with this: Suppose I'm rendering on a system with
square pixels, but the image will be displayed on a system with non-square
pixels. A specific example would be creating a Win98 splash screen. That
needs to be rendered at 320x400, at a 4:3 aspect ratio.
--
Mark
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Mark Wagner" <mar### [at] gte net> wrote in message
news:3ba03c9d@news.povray.org...
> Fabien Mosen wrote in message <3b9efbef@news.povray.org>...
> >There should maybe be a feature (set by default) to automatically adjust
> >the rendering area to the camera's aspect ratio. I can't think of any
> >situation where it would be problematic.
>
> I see one possible problem with this: Suppose I'm rendering on a system
with
> square pixels, but the image will be displayed on a system with non-square
> pixels. A specific example would be creating a Win98 splash screen. That
> needs to be rendered at 320x400, at a 4:3 aspect ratio.
>
Then you unset the 'automatically adjust resolution to fit desired
aspect ratio' option... ;-) Seriously, though, as you point out, there are
situations where this automatic adjustment could be annoying I think these
are far fewer than those situations in which the current settings are
annoying... I don't think Fabien was suggesting doing anything that would
make it impossible to render at non-matching scene and output aspect
ratios...
--
Scott Hill.
Software Engineer.
E-Mail : sco### [at] innocent com
Pandora's Box : http://www.pandora-software.com
*Everything in this message/post is purely IMHO and no-one-else's*
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |