 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Philippe Debar wrote:
>I like the Nike logo quite much, but I won't say it makes
>sense. With an explanation, my apreciation of this logo would certainly
>change (is it clever, amusing or dumb or boring?)
If I'm not mistaken the Nike logo symbolises the wings of the greek goddess
Nike. She is the goddess of victory and bringer of good messages.
Ingo
--
Photography: http://members.home.nl/ingoogni/
Pov-Ray : http://members.home.nl/seed7/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Philippe Debar" wrote:
> I think a logo can be good by itself and even better
> when you get the explanation.
I agree.
> Given the size of a text file, it would be a pity if
> authors could not explain themselves.
The size was never a problem.
> Another example, although a less direct one, is the
> IRTC : I read many times voters/commenters writing
> things like "I did not understand/like this image at
> first, but after reading the text, I find it excellent."
The problem here is that a logo ought to be excellent even without any
explaination.
> To summarise, I would say that a good logo is good by
> itself and is good with the explanation.
I agree.
> > So I don't know. What do others think?
I wrote that, and I still don't know the answer.
Lets start a discussion about it later and finish this discussion first.
> > And by the way, what do you think of the image
> > formats themselves?
>
> They're OK by me. I'd just make the custom formats
> freer, more custom.
Hmm, if more people think your suggestion is better, then we should go with
that one instead. Try to start a new thread where you formulate your
suggestion clearly and ask what people think of it.
Greetings,
Rune
---
Updated April 25: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk
Containing 3D images, stereograms, tutorials,
The POV Desktop Theme, 350+ raytracing jokes,
miscellaneous other things, and a lot of fun!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> logos should make sense without an explanation
Absolutely!
--
Peter
http://hertel.no/bigone
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Rune" wrote:
> Based on the feedback I have got, I have made a new
> suggestion for the submission formats in the POV-Ray
> Logo Contest. 2 "black and white" versions, 2 "color"
> versions, and 3 "custom" versions.
<snip>
> What do you think? I hope as many as possible will reply.
OK, it seems like this thread no longer grows now.
It seems to me that people generally think the suggestion is OK.
I have got some positive replies, some with questions which I have trid to
answer, but no directly negative replies (where "negative" simply means "not
agreeing").
So if I get no objections, I will include this in the rules of the contest.
I will wait, say 3 days, so you have time to reply if you have any
objections.
Greetings,
Rune
---
Updated April 25: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk
Containing 3D images, stereograms, tutorials,
The POV Desktop Theme, 350+ raytracing jokes,
miscellaneous other things, and a lot of fun!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
