 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Phil Clute wrote:
>
> I have a little battle of the tracers going on in a
> seperate group between Pov and Lightwave. I'm sort of
> limited in what I can use to fight back because I was comparing
> the difference between using image_maps for texture or using
> pigments, normals etc.
>
> They sent this(lightwave 6.0 btw).
> http://www.tiac.net/users/pclute/oera_vw_rad.jpg
> Honestly, I don't think the textures are that interesting. They're
> pretty much plain colors. But it looks very believable.
> I wonder though...with a tree macro, some media clouds...I don't
> think this is unattainable with pov or megapov.
>
> --
Look at Gilles current IRTC entry
http://www.irtc.org/ftp/pub/stills/2000-04-30/gt_city.jpg
Should do as an answer ...
Marc
--
Marc Schimmler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Marc Schimmler wrote:
> Look at Gilles current IRTC entry
>
> http://www.irtc.org/ftp/pub/stills/2000-04-30/gt_city.jpg
>
> Should do as an answer ...
*just stares at it dumbfounded*
--
Lance
The Zone
http://come.to/the.zone
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Lance Birch wrote:
>
> Marc Schimmler wrote:
> > Look at Gilles current IRTC entry
> >
> > http://www.irtc.org/ftp/pub/stills/2000-04-30/gt_city.jpg
> >
> > Should do as an answer ...
>
> *just stares at it dumbfounded*
>
That's what I did for many minutes.
Marc
--
Marc Schimmler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 02 May 2000 03:11:17 -0400, Glen Berry wrote:
>You seem to have overlooked one other quality that is often mentioned
>when trying to rationalize what to honor in a hall of fame: Images
>that represent an important historical breakthrough. One example of
>this might the image that Ron Parker created with his custom
>motion-blur patch of POV-Ray. As far as I know, this was the first
>motion-blurred image created strictly with POV-Ray and no external
>utilities. I think it was also an IRTC winner. It's the one with
>mousetraps and yellow balls flying everywhere.
That wasn't mine.
--
Ron Parker http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
These are my opinions. I do NOT speak for the POV-Team.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Marc Schimmler wrote:
> Lance Birch wrote:
> >
> > Marc Schimmler wrote:
> > > Look at Gilles current IRTC entry
> > >
> > > http://www.irtc.org/ftp/pub/stills/2000-04-30/gt_city.jpg
> > >
> > > Should do as an answer ...
> >
> > *just stares at it dumbfounded*
> >
>
> That's what I did for many minutes.
It took me at least five minutes before I snapped out of it and emailed
Gilles ;)
--
Lance
The Zone
http://come.to/the.zone
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2 May 2000 09:14:28 -0400, ron### [at] povray org (Ron Parker)
wrote:
>On Tue, 02 May 2000 03:11:17 -0400, Glen Berry wrote:
>>You seem to have overlooked one other quality that is often mentioned
>>when trying to rationalize what to honor in a hall of fame: Images
>>that represent an important historical breakthrough. One example of
>>this might the image that Ron Parker created with his custom
>>motion-blur patch of POV-Ray. As far as I know, this was the first
>>motion-blurred image created strictly with POV-Ray and no external
>>utilities. I think it was also an IRTC winner. It's the one with
>>mousetraps and yellow balls flying everywhere.
>
>That wasn't mine.
Ooops! (embarrasment)
( Remove the "7" from 7no### [at] ezwvcom to email me. )
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Look at Gilles current IRTC entry...
I like it, but I can't help but mention that for some strange reason, the
fire hydrant bothers me. It just pops out in a way I don't like. Also,
shouldn't that bird be scaled a little smaller? (Unless this is some large
variety of crow I've never seen.) And lastly, the person is blurred just a
little too heavily for my taste. That and the hydrant for some reason,
distract me. Except for that, this is a <censoring
beep>F%^*(&X(^#$#*(]C()&!*(#^_*F$(%&^#*</censoring beep> good image. :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
TonyB wrote:
>
> >Look at Gilles current IRTC entry...
>
> I like it, but I can't help but mention that for some strange reason, the
> fire hydrant bothers me. It just pops out in a way I don't like.
Maybe ...
> Also,
> shouldn't that bird be scaled a little smaller? (Unless this is some large
> variety of crow I've never seen.)
The Raven ... nevermore?
> And lastly, the person is blurred just a
> little too heavily for my taste. That and the hydrant for some reason,
> distract me. Except for that, this is a <censoring
> beep>F%^*(&X(^#$#*(]C()&!*(#^_*F$(%&^#*</censoring beep> good image. :)
true
Marc
--
Marc Schimmler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Right after I posted I went to see the entries...
Yikes!
I do agree with Tony about the fire hydrant, although I can't
quite figure out why it bothers me. I think because everything
else looks soo real, it looks a bit CG(imagine that).
As for the crow Tony...That'a just a baby, I've seen crows around
here that look like black cats with wings. :)
--
Phil
...coffee?...yes please! extra sugar,extra cream...Thank you.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>As for the crow Tony...That'a just a baby, I've seen crows around
>here that look like black cats with wings. :)
Whoa...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
