 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Check it out - http://home4.inet.tele.dk/ibras/panorama.htm
--
Ken Tyler - 1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Looks good, but didn't work for me.... :( using IE5.0
Mike
"Ken" <tyl### [at] pacbell net> wrote in message
news:38C9252D.C14F0AC9@pacbell.net...
>
> Check it out - http://home4.inet.tele.dk/ibras/panorama.htm
>
> --
> Ken Tyler - 1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
> http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Weber wrote:
>
> Looks good, but didn't work for me.... :( using IE5.0
It took a very long time for the applets to load using Netscape 4.72
but once they finally appeared they worked as advertized. You may
want to try again. It took maybe 3-5 min. before I was able to see
each one.
--
Ken Tyler - 1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Bill DeWitt
Subject: Re: 3D Panoramas and Objects ala POV-Ray
Date: 10 Mar 2000 13:20:17
Message: <38c93ce1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That's pretty cool, but too bad there is only one view point.
If only VRML looked so good...
"Ken" <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in message
news:38C9252D.C14F0AC9@pacbell.net...
>
> Check it out - http://home4.inet.tele.dk/ibras/panorama.htm
>
> --
> Ken Tyler - 1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
> http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bill DeWitt wrote:
>
> That's pretty cool, but too bad there is only one view point.
> If only VRML looked so good...
I was wondering what kind of resolution you would have to render at to
be able to get clean zooms on distant objects. If you zoom into these
examples to far you get a lot pixelated objects but not much definition.
--
Ken Tyler - 1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
oh my... if we're not careful we'll get a new competion for full fledged
environments! This is great. I'm glad he explains his techniques.
Ken wrote:
> Check it out - http://home4.inet.tele.dk/ibras/panorama.htm
>
> --
> Ken Tyler - 1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
> http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
--
Josh English
eng### [at] spiritonecom
"May your hopes, dreams, and plans not be destroyed by a few zeros."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote:
>
>
>Mike Weber wrote:
>>
>> Looks good, but didn't work for me.... :( using IE5.0
>
>It took a very long time for the applets to load using Netscape 4.72
>but once they finally appeared they worked as advertized. You may
>want to try again. It took maybe 3-5 min. before I was able to see
>each one.
I have the same problem as Mike but It's because I don't want to download
Microsoft Virtual Machine (4.5 Meg) since I'm on a 33.6k modem. I just
_hate_ M$
Jide
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote:
> Check it out - http://home4.inet.tele.dk/ibras/panorama.htm
That's pretty spiffy, Unky Ken.
How can the program get smooth pictures of any angle from two fisheye views?
--
___ _______________________________________________
| \ |_ <dav### [at] faricynet> <ICQ 55354965>
|_/avid |ontaine http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
"The only difference between me and a madman is that I'm not mad." -Dali
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Oh oh: you are on dangerous grounds - hating is not allowed :)
--
Regards,
Sander
38c97376$1@news.povray.org...
<snip>. I just
> _hate_ M$
>
> Jide
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That's directly dependent on how far in you want to zoom, no?
Just like with regular bitmaps.
Margus
Ken wrote:
>
> I was wondering what kind of resolution you would have to render at to
> be able to get clean zooms on distant objects. If you zoom into these
> examples to far you get a lot pixelated objects but not much definition.
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
