POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : Removing keyword "hollow" from pov3.5 or 4 Server Time
11 Aug 2024 01:17:17 EDT (-0400)
  Removing keyword "hollow" from pov3.5 or 4 (Message 21 to 22 of 22)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Ron Parker
Subject: Re: Removing keyword "hollow" from pov3.5 or 4
Date: 17 Nov 1999 08:06:15
Message: <slrn835a0f.v8.ron.parker@ron.gwmicro.com>
On Wed, 17 Nov 1999 00:59:40 -0500, Mark Wagner wrote:
>
>Ron Parker wrote in message ...
>>On 16 Nov 1999 07:27:57 -0500, Nieminen Juha wrote:
>>>TonyB <ben### [at] panamaphoenixnet> wrote:
>>>: There can be a max of 30 user defined Light groups
>>>
>>>  Why?
>>
>>Because MCB used a 32-bit integer to store which light groups are
>>in effect for a given object or light source.  It's a design decision,
>>basically.
>
>
>Just today I finished debugging a modification to the Superpatch which
>removes the limits on the number of light groups and the number of entries
>in a pure spline.  I can send you the modifications tomorrow if you want me
>to.

Yes, please.  That'd be great.

-- 
These are my opinions.  I do NOT speak for the POV-Team.
The superpatch: http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/superpatch/
My other stuff: http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html


Post a reply to this message

From: Ian Burgmyer
Subject: Re: Removing keyword "hollow" from pov3.5 or 4
Date: 3 Dec 1999 00:42:41
Message: <38475851@news.povray.org>
How about using a sort of mass instead?  That might be too similar to media,
however.

--
This message brought to you by:
-=< Ian (the### [at] hotmailcom >=-

Please visit my site at http://spectere2000.cjb.net! :)

Nieminen Juha <war### [at] punarastascstutfi> wrote in message
news:382c2d31@news.povray.org...
>   I think it should be a good idea to remove the keyword "hollow" from
> the next version of povray (and replace it with a more descriptive
keyword).
> It only causes lots of confusion among new users and it doesn't really
> describe its purpose.
>   This suggestion is not as bad is it may sound. This has already
happened:
> the "refraction" keyword has become obsolete. Also all the old halo stuff
> has been removed. Things have been moved from "finish" to "interior".
> Radiosity will probably change in the near future.
>   Removing "hollow" may cause problems at the beginning, but in the long
run
> it will do just good.
>
>   I have to admit that I don't have any good idea for an alternative
keyword.
>
> --
> main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
> ):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.