How about using a sort of mass instead?  That might be too similar to media,
however.

--
This message brought to you by:
-=< Ian (the### [at] hotmailcom >=-

Please visit my site at http://spectere2000.cjb.net! :)

Nieminen Juha <war### [at] punarastascstutfi> wrote in message
news:382c2d31@news.povray.org...
>   I think it should be a good idea to remove the keyword "hollow" from
> the next version of povray (and replace it with a more descriptive
keyword).
> It only causes lots of confusion among new users and it doesn't really
> describe its purpose.
>   This suggestion is not as bad is it may sound. This has already
happened:
> the "refraction" keyword has become obsolete. Also all the old halo stuff
> has been removed. Things have been moved from "finish" to "interior".
> Radiosity will probably change in the near future.
>   Removing "hollow" may cause problems at the beginning, but in the long
run
> it will do just good.
>
>   I have to admit that I don't have any good idea for an alternative
keyword.
>
> --
> main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
> ):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/

Post a reply to this message