Twyst wrote:

> The next section I'll work on is the links.. Ken, care to take this position
> once I get the system in place? =D
> thanx,
> Twyst

I don't mind contributing links to your site but it is not my idea of a good
time plugging 750 links into your system one at a time. There has got to be
an easier way :) Might I suggest that I send you a copy of my html version of
the links and you can simply use them as a seperate attraction to your links ?
Or if you prefer I can send the aforementioned collection to you and you can
then incorporate them in some other format that suits your needs.

-- 
Ken Tyler
  
mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/links.htm

Post a reply to this message

Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in message
news:37A89D61.DAEA40E1@pacbell.net...
>
>
> Twyst wrote:
>
> > The next section I'll work on is the links.. Ken, care to take this
position
> > once I get the system in place? =D
> > thanx,
> > Twyst
>
> I don't mind contributing links to your site but it is not my idea of a
good
> time plugging 750 links into your system one at a time. There has got to
be
> an easier way :) Might I suggest that I send you a copy of my html version
of
> the links and you can simply use them as a seperate attraction to your
links ?
> Or if you prefer I can send the aforementioned collection to you and you
can
> then incorporate them in some other format that suits your needs.
>
> --
> Ken Tyler
>
> mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
> http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/links.htm


Heh. It's not MY idea of a good time, either. But I do have a CGI app that
will bulk-add a large list of links (or I can use Excel, too. :D ) - I've
done it before. If you want to send them, great! I'll do the grunt work. =D.
I know I need to re-organize the links I do have, anyways. The categories
aren't the best.

Twyst

Post a reply to this message

On Sat, 31 Jul 1999 16:21:44 +0200, Spider <spi### [at] bahnhofse> wrote:

>Twyst wrote:
[snip]

Hi Twyst, good to see you back.

I have to concur with some of the other voices here with a distinct
preferance for a lean, clean interface (text aint so bad you know).

>
>> 5) Advertising
>Banners can be survived, popupwindows CANNOT.
>
This can't be emphasised enough. Banners don't aggravate half as much
as annoying pop-up windows!

If I can think of any way to help, I'll offer up as and when.


Cheers,

Cliff Bowman
Why not pay my 3D Dr Who site a visit at http://www.who3d.cwc.net/
PS change ".duffcom" to ".net" if replying via e-mail

Post a reply to this message

On Sat, 31 Jul 1999 22:47:34 -0600, "Twyst" <twy### [at] twystednet> wrote:

>Well, as the overwhelming response is 'No Flash', I won't be using it.
>
>Here's a new question: What browsers are people running? I do try to keep my
>site text-friendly, but I need to know how high a level I should be using.
> should I restrict myself to IE 3.0 and netscape 2? (god, I hope not!) )
>
IE5 - actually the version which ships with Win98SE (which I *think*
is the latest version of IE5).


Cheers,

Cliff Bowman
Why not pay my 3D Dr Who site a visit at http://www.who3d.cwc.net/
PS change ".duffcom" to ".net" if replying via e-mail

Post a reply to this message

Twyst wrote:

> Heh. It's not MY idea of a good time, either. But I do have a CGI app that
> will bulk-add a large list of links (or I can use Excel, too. :D ) - I've
> done it before. If you want to send them, great! I'll do the grunt work. =D.
> I know I need to re-organize the links I do have, anyways. The categories
> aren't the best.
> 
> Twyst

  They have been sent. Have they been recieved ? If not you can get an exact
duplicate of what I sent from the announcement group on this server.

-- 
Ken Tyler
  
mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/links.htm

Post a reply to this message

Yep, got them...


Thanx. =D


Twyst.

Post a reply to this message