 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Jul 1999 06:18:18 -0500, Bob Hughes <inv### [at] aol com> wrote:
>Have a look at this latest one please, anyone who is there in the UK and
>surrounding region (a few minutes from time of this message post).
OK, now the spots in Finland are too far north, and the odd bloke from
halfway between Tallinn and Helsinki has decided to live in the latter :-)
--
Antti Arola
aar### [at] lutfi
ICQ: 18685389
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
At least everybody's dry now...
Margus
Antti Arola wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Jul 1999 06:18:18 -0500, Bob Hughes <inv### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> >Have a look at this latest one please, anyone who is there in the UK and
> >surrounding region (a few minutes from time of this message post).
>
> OK, now the spots in Finland are too far north, and the odd bloke from
> halfway between Tallinn and Helsinki has decided to live in the latter :-)
>
> --
> Antti Arola
> aar### [at] lutfi
> ICQ: 18685389
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yeah, it's not perfect to be sure. At least I don't think so. Like we're
all the ones messed up instead or something? No, I'd have to say these
images never map exactly right. Whether it be POV-Ray at fault or the
image used isn't correct is anyones guess. The previous image I had used
was definately off, I had to actually add in a slice of longitude
(couple degrees or more) and maybe even a bit to the North or South pole
but I don't remember. The problem comes when trying to adjust for all
points on the globe you see. Were it a simple singular direction (scale)
it wouldn't be so tough; but if even a rescaling, or resizing rather, of
both latitude and longitude fails it's just never going to be right.
Well, never say never.
Anyhow so far it looks as if were I to move anything one way a lot of
points shift badly the other, and likewise for the other directions.
Could be a mapping type of problem but I don't see it that way yet.
Thanks for speaking up regardless, Antti A.
Antti Arola wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Jul 1999 06:18:18 -0500, Bob Hughes <inv### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> >Have a look at this latest one please, anyone who is there in the UK and
> >surrounding region (a few minutes from time of this message post).
>
> OK, now the spots in Finland are too far north, and the odd bloke from
> halfway between Tallinn and Helsinki has decided to live in the latter :-)
>
> --
> Antti Arola
> aar### [at] lutfi
> ICQ: 18685389
--
omniVERSE: beyond the universe
http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
mailto://inversez@aol.com?Subject=PoV-News
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Agreed, MK should go into Room 101, I worked there for six weeks
and when I left vowed never to return.
Matthew Bennett wrote:
>
> Cliff Bowman <who### [at] spamcitycom> wrote in message
> news:37766ca4.7134056@news.povray.org...
> > On Sun, 27 Jun 1999 01:03:25 -0500, Bob <inv### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> > > Anyhow, all else appears to be aligning fairly well,
> > >but England? It's like a terrible earthquake has shifted it toward the
> continent. I
> > >haven't a good fix for this yet, I hate to think the coordinate numbers
> need a
> > >subtraction by more than a degree and even worse the prospect of cut &
> pasting Great
> > >Britain. Not a thing I like to do, playing god.
> >
> >
> > If you do have to resort to moving the UK - could you move us somewhat
> > south? I know the weather's pretty good here at the moment, but we
> > could do with a warmer average <g>
>
> Yeah, and airbrush out any clouds.
> In fact, you could airbrush out Milton Keynes while you're at it :P
>
> /\/\/\//
--
Cheers
Steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error reading file mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bob
There's a question mark next to my name for some reason,
(probably why I'm in the sea), (Wigan North West England).
Bob Hughes wrote:
>
> You will have email from me soon. But yes, I've noticed aligment
> troubles from the beginning, it comes down to the image_map used mostly,
> along with possible inaccuracies of lat/lon coordinate submissions. Some
> are just city or town names, the East West or South North
> positive/negative is most important when sent in. Luckily everyone
> states their placename as well, usually.
>
> http://members.aol.com/wrld0rigin/uk.htm
>
> Have a look at this latest one please, anyone who is there in the UK and
> surrounding region (a few minutes from time of this message post).
>
> Bob
>
> Scott Hill wrote:
> >
> > Bob <inv### [at] aolcom> wrote in message news:3772E7C3.74469EE9@aol.com...
> > > http://members.aol.com/wrld0rigin/povwrldjpg.htm
> > >
> >
> > I think you ought to check on the alignment of the image map you're
> > using.
> >
> > At first I thought I'd been missed, checked you list, and sure enough,
> > I'm on there.
> > But where ? Let me tell you none of the spots on the UK are over
> > Cambridge (where I am).
> > Then I noticed those two spots that seem to be floating in the sea.
> >
> > Could it be that you're image map is shifted a couple of degrees to the
> > east ? (or that the spots are shifted a couple of degrees west). That would
> > explain the spots off the west coasts of Wales & Ireland and correcting it
> > would put one of the spots roughly over Cambridge !
> >
> > --
> > Scott Hill : sco### [at] cyberlifecouk
> > Software Engineer (and all round nice guy)
> > Author of Pandora's Box : Watch this space.
> > Work homepage : http://www.cyberlife.co.uk
> >
> > "We will decide what the news is. The news is what we tell you it is." - The
> > Fox TV network.
>
> --
> omniVERSE: beyond the universe
> http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
> mailto://inversez@aol.com?Subject=PoV-News
--
Cheers
Steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error reading file mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I finally have Outlook Express 5 figured out enough to post replies so
I'm posting here even though I have sent email already to you Steve.
Just so people know I am still here :)
For the curious, Steve had sent me his coordinates as numbers without
decimal places in the degree fields, no minutes. That was the
confusion. Not that it will correct anything probably because I think
I had guessed the correct numbers anyway from what he gave me.
Bob
Steve <sjl### [at] ndirectcouk> wrote in message
news:37AB5FE7.25F72A53@ndirect.co.uk...
> Bob
>
> There's a question mark next to my name for some reason,
> (probably why I'm in the sea), (Wigan North West England).
>
> Bob Hughes wrote:
> >
> > You will have email from me soon. But yes, I've noticed aligment
> > troubles from the beginning, it comes down to the image_map used
mostly,
> > along with possible inaccuracies of lat/lon coordinate
submissions. Some
> > are just city or town names, the East West or South North
> > positive/negative is most important when sent in. Luckily everyone
> > states their placename as well, usually.
> >
> > http://members.aol.com/wrld0rigin/uk.htm
> >
> > Have a look at this latest one please, anyone who is there in the
UK and
> > surrounding region (a few minutes from time of this message post).
> >
> > Bob
> >
> > Scott Hill wrote:
> > >
> > > Bob <inv### [at] aolcom> wrote in message
news:3772E7C3.74469EE9@aol.com...
> > > > http://members.aol.com/wrld0rigin/povwrldjpg.htm
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think you ought to check on the alignment of the image map
you're
> > > using.
> > >
> > > At first I thought I'd been missed, checked you list, and
sure enough,
> > > I'm on there.
> > > But where ? Let me tell you none of the spots on the UK are
over
> > > Cambridge (where I am).
> > > Then I noticed those two spots that seem to be floating in
the sea.
> > >
> > > Could it be that you're image map is shifted a couple of
degrees to the
> > > east ? (or that the spots are shifted a couple of degrees west).
That would
> > > explain the spots off the west coasts of Wales & Ireland and
correcting it
> > > would put one of the spots roughly over Cambridge !
> > >
> > > --
> > > Scott Hill : sco### [at] cyberlifecouk
> > > Software Engineer (and all round nice guy)
> > > Author of Pandora's Box : Watch this space.
> > > Work homepage : http://www.cyberlife.co.uk
> > >
> > > "We will decide what the news is. The news is what we tell you
it is." - The
> > > Fox TV network.
> >
> > --
> > omniVERSE: beyond the universe
> > http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
> > mailto://inversez@aol.com?Subject=PoV-News
>
> --
> Cheers
> Steve
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------
> %HAV-A-NICEDAY Error reading file mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bob I'll check it out and get back to you soon. Sorry to see
you've turned to MS why? Netscape does it all, or even agent.
Bob Hughes wrote:
>
> I finally have Outlook Express 5 figured out enough to post replies so
> I'm posting here even though I have sent email already to you Steve.
> Just so people know I am still here :)
> For the curious, Steve had sent me his coordinates as numbers without
> decimal places in the degree fields, no minutes. That was the
> confusion. Not that it will correct anything probably because I think
> I had guessed the correct numbers anyway from what he gave me.
>
> Bob
>
> Steve <sjl### [at] ndirectcouk> wrote in message
> news:37AB5FE7.25F72A53@ndirect.co.uk...
> > Bob
> >
> > There's a question mark next to my name for some reason,
> > (probably why I'm in the sea), (Wigan North West England).
> >
> > Bob Hughes wrote:
> > >
> > > You will have email from me soon. But yes, I've noticed aligment
> > > troubles from the beginning, it comes down to the image_map used
> mostly,
> > > along with possible inaccuracies of lat/lon coordinate
> submissions. Some
> > > are just city or town names, the East West or South North
> > > positive/negative is most important when sent in. Luckily everyone
> > > states their placename as well, usually.
> > >
> > > http://members.aol.com/wrld0rigin/uk.htm
> > >
> > > Have a look at this latest one please, anyone who is there in the
> UK and
> > > surrounding region (a few minutes from time of this message post).
> > >
> > > Bob
> > >
> > > Scott Hill wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Bob <inv### [at] aolcom> wrote in message
> news:3772E7C3.74469EE9@aol.com...
> > > > > http://members.aol.com/wrld0rigin/povwrldjpg.htm
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think you ought to check on the alignment of the image map
> you're
> > > > using.
> > > >
> > > > At first I thought I'd been missed, checked you list, and
> sure enough,
> > > > I'm on there.
> > > > But where ? Let me tell you none of the spots on the UK are
> over
> > > > Cambridge (where I am).
> > > > Then I noticed those two spots that seem to be floating in
> the sea.
> > > >
> > > > Could it be that you're image map is shifted a couple of
> degrees to the
> > > > east ? (or that the spots are shifted a couple of degrees west).
> That would
> > > > explain the spots off the west coasts of Wales & Ireland and
> correcting it
> > > > would put one of the spots roughly over Cambridge !
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Scott Hill : sco### [at] cyberlifecouk
> > > > Software Engineer (and all round nice guy)
> > > > Author of Pandora's Box : Watch this space.
> > > > Work homepage : http://www.cyberlife.co.uk
> > > >
> > > > "We will decide what the news is. The news is what we tell you
> it is." - The
> > > > Fox TV network.
> > >
> > > --
> > > omniVERSE: beyond the universe
> > > http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
> > > mailto://inversez@aol.com?Subject=PoV-News
> >
> > --
> > Cheers
> > Steve
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------
> > %HAV-A-NICEDAY Error reading file mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk
--
Cheers
Steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error reading file mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Odd IE tendancies I suppose ;)
Netscape was fine actually, I just wanted to try to update this Win
system with the IE5 stuff and gave Outlook a whirl. It really does
have a few good points and does seem a bit faster as per
advertisement.
Bob
Steve <sjl### [at] ndirectcouk> wrote in message
news:37B6192A.8C0E2497@ndirect.co.uk...
> Bob I'll check it out and get back to you soon. Sorry to see
> you've turned to MS why? Netscape does it all, or even agent.
>
> Bob Hughes wrote:
> >
> > I finally have Outlook Express 5 figured out enough to post
replies so
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bob Hughes wrote:
>
> Odd IE tendancies I suppose ;)
> Netscape was fine actually, I just wanted to try to update this Win
> system with the IE5 stuff and gave Outlook a whirl. It really does
> have a few good points and does seem a bit faster as per
> advertisement.
>
> Bob
Faster in what regard ?
--
Ken Tyler
See my 700+ Povray and 3D Rendering and Raytracing Links at:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote:
> Bob Hughes wrote:
> >
> > Odd IE tendancies I suppose ;)
> > Netscape was fine actually, I just wanted to try to update this Win
> > system with the IE5 stuff and gave Outlook a whirl. It really does
> > have a few good points and does seem a bit faster as per
> > advertisement.
> >
> > Bob
>
> Faster in what regard ?
>
> --
> Ken Tyler
>
> See my 700+ Povray and 3D Rendering and Raytracing Links at:
> http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html
Um, maybe faster in corrupting your data? Or faster since it ignores
most of the RFC's and standards and just does what the MS engineers just
bothered checking for? Or faster as it does not even bother formatting
text properly for non-HTML and non-RTF posts? Or faster at spreading
macro viruses and trojans as it 'hides all the messy details from
users'? Or faster at mangling downloads as it completely ignores
MIME-types and does what the HTTP specs says explicitly NOT to do (RFC
1945 section 7.2.1)...
--
"My new computer's got the clocks, it rocks
But it was obsolete before I opened the box" - W.A.Y.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
