 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Why is it that every time a new version is released, some people get
paranoid about if it will be freely distributable or not?
Delay in availability doesn't mean it will not be available. They have
to test their program. If they publish each version right after it's
compiled, we would have a povray 3.1099999832h every week.
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nieminen Mika wrote in message <36f54b51.0@news.povray.org>...
> Why is it that every time a new version is released, some people get
>paranoid about if it will be freely distributable or not?
Sorry, I didn't mean to give the impression of being paranoid. I was just
curious if there was anywhere non-compuserve members could download the (I
was thinking specifically windows) POV3.1e. Of course I know it will remain
freely distributed - I just like updating my version as soon as possible :)
Matt
> Delay in availability doesn't mean it will not be available. They have
>to test their program. If they publish each version right after it's
>compiled, we would have a povray 3.1099999832h every week.
>
>--
>main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
>):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I don't have CS. It worked for me .
--
//Spider
[ spi### [at] bahnhof se ]-[ http://www.bahnhof.se/~spider/ ]
What I can do and what I could do, I just don't know anymore
"Marian"
By: "Sisters Of Mercy"
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Sorry, I didn't mean to give the impression of being paranoid. I was just
>curious if there was anywhere non-compuserve members could download the (I
>was thinking specifically windows) POV3.1e. Of course I know it will remain
>freely distributed - I just like updating my version as soon as possible :)
The Windows 3.1e is not even available on Compuserve yet (though it will be
within 24 hours).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
povray.org admin team wrote:
>
> >Sorry, I didn't mean to give the impression of being paranoid. I was just
> >curious if there was anywhere non-compuserve members could download the (I
> >was thinking specifically windows) POV3.1e. Of course I know it will remain
> >freely distributed - I just like updating my version as soon as possible :)
>
> The Windows 3.1e is not even available on Compuserve yet (though it will be
> within 24 hours).
You shouldn't have told them. Now they are going to get all
excited and we will have another rash of "Where can I get it ?"
and "When can I get it ?" questions.
< shrug >
Oh well I'm patient and can wait until it's fully cooked and
ready to serve. Just ring the bell when supper is ready.
--
Ken Tyler
mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
povray.org admin team wrote in message
<36f64345.16569687@news.povray.org>...
>>Sorry, I didn't mean to give the impression of being paranoid. I was just
>>curious if there was anywhere non-compuserve members could download the (I
>>was thinking specifically windows) POV3.1e. Of course I know it will
remain
>>freely distributed - I just like updating my version as soon as possible
:)
>
>The Windows 3.1e is not even available on Compuserve yet (though it will be
>within 24 hours).
Thanks for the info Admin.
An informed reply like this was all I was asking for ;)
Matt
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 21 Mar 1999 19:46:46 +0100, Kalle Anka <kal### [at] ankacom> wrote:
>But I would love to see a anon. CVS for pov, with a std. tree and a
>superpatch tree.
So would I. But first I have to get a machine with 24/7 connectivity
and sufficient power to run a CVS server. Even so, the "standard" tree
will only be updated when official sources are released to the Internet.
That's the best you can hope for, anyway, since the POV-Team doesn't
even use any kind of version control.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
par### [at] my-dejanewscom (Ron Parker) wrote:
>That's the best you can hope for, anyway, since the POV-Team doesn't
>even use any kind of version control.
not on the main source. but the windows version certainly is (thanks to
perforce software).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nieminen Mika wrote:
>
> Why is it that every time a new version is released, some people get
> paranoid about if it will be freely distributable or not?
> Delay in availability doesn't mean it will not be available. They have
> to test their program. If they publish each version right after it's
> compiled, we would have a povray 3.1099999832h every week.
Just like Leveller back in its beta days...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
John VanSickle wrote:
> > If they publish each version right after it's
> > compiled, we would have a povray 3.1099999832h every week.
>
> Just like Leveller back in its beta days...
That explains the groove in the internet between my house
and Taps's site.
--
Bob Crispen
cri### [at] hiwaaynet
What a day, what a day, for an auto-da-fe.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
