|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Margus Ramst wrote:
>
> Take a look at http://miralabs.unige.ch
> They have some interesting stuff about creating skin textures. They also
> research simulating hair, clothes etc.
> And it seems they really like Marilyn Monroe...
>
> Margus
When I try to use this link Netscape says no DNS entry. Is it a typo?
Marc
--
Marc Schimmler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sorry. http://miralabwww.unige.ch
margus
Marc Schimmler wrote:
> When I try to use this link Netscape says no DNS entry. Is it a typo?
>
> Marc
> --
> Marc Schimmler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Marc Schimmler wrote:
>> Maybe we should skip the grass for a few days and start a competition on
>> skin texture!
The February 1999 issue of Computer Graphics World features cover art
rendered by Digital Domain ("Titanic"). The face uses a bump map texture
created by an inked impression of an actual person's face. The online image
at CGW's site does not do justice to the actual published cover art of the
magazine (it's pretty good).
http://www.cgw.com/cgw/Archives/1999/02toc1.asp
- Alan
-----------------------------------------------
"This is strictly business - not personal"
- Michael Corleone (Al Pacino) "The Godfather"
-----------------------------------------------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Alan Kong wrote:
>
> The February 1999 issue of Computer Graphics World features cover art
> rendered by Digital Domain ("Titanic"). The face uses a bump map texture
> created by an inked impression of an actual person's face. The online image
> at CGW's site does not do justice to the actual published cover art of the
> magazine (it's pretty good).
>
> http://www.cgw.com/cgw/Archives/1999/02toc1.asp
>
> - Alan
This is even better than the one from Bill Fleming. I just stared on it
for a minute or so. I see a project rising at the horizon (Oh yeah, so
much do to ... and no time left!)
Thank you!
Marc
--
Marc Schimmler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Marc Schimmler wrote:
>> This is even better than the one from Bill Fleming. I just stared on it
>> for a minute or so. I see a project rising at the horizon (Oh yeah, so
>> much do to ... and no time left!)
You might consider starting with a finger or a hand first. Evenly applying
ink to one's face and trying to 'roll' this image smoothly onto a long sheet
of paper will probably take several tries <g>.
- Alan
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Alan Kong wrote:
>
> Marc Schimmler wrote:
> >> This is even better than the one from Bill Fleming. I just stared on it
> >> for a minute or so. I see a project rising at the horizon (Oh yeah, so
> >> much do to ... and no time left!)
>
> You might consider starting with a finger or a hand first. Evenly applying
> ink to one's face and trying to 'roll' this image smoothly onto a long sheet
> of paper will probably take several tries <g>.
>
> - Alan
But this might improve your skin texture (the original one!). <g>
But the idea is not that bad (just ink to finger). One can try to render
his or her own fingerprints!
Marc
--
Marc Schimmler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Marc Schimmler wrote:
>> But the idea is not that bad (just ink to finger). One can try to render
>> his or her own fingerprints!
Hmm... on second thought, maybe I should add a warning to this idea -
"Don't post your fingerprints on the internet!" It may sound like a bit of
paranoia on my part but who knows what someone might do with a high-quality
reproduction of *your* fingerprints <g>.
Footprints might be pretty harmless, though.
- Alan
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Alan Kong schrieb in Nachricht <36D959A0.918C31B1@compuserveNO-SPAM.com>...
> Hmm... on second thought, maybe I should add a warning to this idea -
>"Don't post your fingerprints on the internet!" It may sound like a bit of
>paranoia on my part but who knows what someone might do with a high-quality
>reproduction of *your* fingerprints <g>.
>
> Footprints might be pretty harmless, though.
Unless they are found at the site of a crime. I think you're right. Don't
publish your fingerprints anywhere.
--
Rudy Velthuis
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Alan Kong wrote:
>
> Marc Schimmler wrote:
> >> But the idea is not that bad (just ink to finger). One can try to render
> >> his or her own fingerprints!
>
> Hmm... on second thought, maybe I should add a warning to this idea -
> "Don't post your fingerprints on the internet!" It may sound like a bit of
> paranoia on my part but who knows what someone might do with a high-quality
> reproduction of *your* fingerprints <g>.
>
Funny, that was the second thought that came into my mind when I wrote
this and at that moment I thought it would be wise to alter the picture
if I post it anywhere.
There is no paranoia to this just that important part of carefulness.
BTW, I heard that the american government thinks about selling their
driving license databases to private organisations. Is that true? I
wouldn't feel good if I knew that there could be private enterprises
running around there that had so much information about me plus a
picture.
> Footprints might be pretty harmless, though.
>
You can't be sure of that.
Marc
--
Marc Schimmler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Marc Schimmler wrote:
>
> Alan Kong wrote:
> >
> > Marc Schimmler wrote:
> > >> But the idea is not that bad (just ink to finger). One can try to render
> > >> his or her own fingerprints!
> >
> > Hmm... on second thought, maybe I should add a warning to this idea -
> > "Don't post your fingerprints on the internet!" It may sound like a bit of
> > paranoia on my part but who knows what someone might do with a high-quality
> > reproduction of *your* fingerprints <g>.
> >
>
> Funny, that was the second thought that came into my mind when I wrote
> this and at that moment I thought it would be wise to alter the picture
> if I post it anywhere.
> There is no paranoia to this just that important part of carefulness.
>
> BTW, I heard that the american government thinks about selling their
> driving license databases to private organisations. Is that true? I
> wouldn't feel good if I knew that there could be private enterprises
> running around there that had so much information about me plus a
> picture.
>
> > Footprints might be pretty harmless, though.
> >
>
> You can't be sure of that.
>
> Marc
> --
> Marc Schimmler
In the U.S.A. all babies have their footprints taken after birth.
At least those born in a hospital.
--
Ken Tyler
mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |