 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Has anyone done anything with POVray on Beowulf (it's a library thing for Linux
to make buncha-normal-comps-networked-together supercomputers) systems?
--
Sam
mailto:smi### [at] paradise netnz
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Horizon/4152/
"Someday we'll look back on this moment and plow into a parked car."
-- Evan Davis
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The Crazy Mule <smi### [at] paradisenetnz> writes:
> Has anyone done anything with POVray on Beowulf (it's a library thing
> for Linux to make buncha-normal-comps-networked-together supercomputers)
> systems?
Isn't PVM included in Beowulf? So, using PVM-Pov should be simple.
Unfortunatly, PVM-Pov still relies on POV-Ray 3.0...
Thomas
--
http://www.fmi.uni-konstanz.de/~willhalm
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 16 Feb 1999 04:48:23 +1300, Thomas Willhalm wrote:
> The Crazy Mule <smi### [at] paradisenetnz> writes:
>
>> Has anyone done anything with POVray on Beowulf (it's a library thing
>> for Linux to make buncha-normal-comps-networked-together
>> supercomputers) systems?
>
> Isn't PVM included in Beowulf? So, using PVM-Pov should be simple.
> Unfortunatly, PVM-Pov still relies on POV-Ray 3.0...
>
> Thomas
>
The latest version of POV-Ray supported by pvmpov is 3.1g, however I have
patched the source of POV-Ray 3.5 with the code from the earlier pvm
patches and I have a running version of pvmpovray35 (as I like to call
it...:-) It still has a few glitches - the statistics don't always work
and I can't track down the source of a seg. fault in close_all()...
Matthew.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Matthew Grove wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 1999 04:48:23 +1300, Thomas Willhalm wrote:
>
>
>>The Crazy Mule <smi### [at] paradisenetnz> writes:
>>
>>
>>>Has anyone done anything with POVray on Beowulf (it's a library thing
>>>for Linux to make buncha-normal-comps-networked-together
>>>supercomputers) systems?
>>>
>>Isn't PVM included in Beowulf? So, using PVM-Pov should be simple.
>>Unfortunatly, PVM-Pov still relies on POV-Ray 3.0...
>>
>>Thomas
>>
>>
>
> The latest version of POV-Ray supported by pvmpov is 3.1g, however I have
> patched the source of POV-Ray 3.5 with the code from the earlier pvm
> patches and I have a running version of pvmpovray35 (as I like to call
> it...:-) It still has a few glitches - the statistics don't always work
> and I can't track down the source of a seg. fault in close_all()...
>
> Matthew.
>
That's great!
Will there be an rpm when it's finished?
Florian Pesth
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
