 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
All good news!!!!
I will now proceed to build a small temple to honour the POV-team. Thank
you POV-team for your work on this incredible program.
--
Chris Maryan
mailto:cma### [at] geocities com
***
Will work for cash.
***
Email me if you are interested in donating
to the Chris Maryan needs money fund.
We will also accept donations to the Chris
needs a Pentium II or SGI workstation
fund and the Chris needs a car fund.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Mick Hazelgrove
Subject: Re: Plans for 1999 (A word from our Sponsers)
Date: 31 Dec 1998 06:29:55
Message: <368b6033.0@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Once again THANKS Pov team - the only sad news is the probably loss of the
iso patch - can we keep some of it, the non Dll part? I espeacially like
using it to create mathmatical surfaces, normal and color patterns.
Keep up the good work
Mick
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gilles will find that a big loss I'm sure... he does some really cool work
with the ISO patch.
--
Lance.
---
For the latest MAX plug-ins, images and much more, go to:
The Zone - http://come.to/the.zone
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Matthew Bennett
Subject: Re: Plans for 1999 (A word from our Sponsers)
Date: 31 Dec 1998 08:50:48
Message: <368b8138.0@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote in message <368AE447.7BEED249@pacbell.net>...
>In light of this information I can only say to all the whining, moaning,
>complaing, impatient users out there quit your darn crying. Your
>wait is nearly over.
I've never really understood why an obvious interest in POV developments is
seen as moaning or being impatient - but hey..
>Oh and Happy New Year !
You too :)
Matt
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Matthew Bennett wrote:
> Ken wrote in message <368AE447.7BEED249@pacbell.net>...
> >In light of this information I can only say to all the whining, moaning,
> >complaing, impatient users out there quit your darn crying. Your
> >wait is nearly over.
>
> I've never really understood why an obvious interest in POV developments is
> seen as moaning or being impatient - but hey..
Your interperatation of my comments shows a lack of understanding
of my sometimes dry sense of humor.
Now in defense of my comments:
Heck Pov currently has so many wonderful features that even if they
stopped development completely I would never be able to use eveything
the program has to offer now. For a few extras I have the virtue of patience,
so I can and will wait for additions at the teams convienece without feeling
a need to rock the boat or decry the injustices of untimly development.
--
Ken Tyler
tyl### [at] pacbellnet
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
He said that just the DLL part would have to be removed:
"Also some of the features
will be modified or eliminated. For example cross-platform
portability is a major design priority and the iso-surface patch makes
use of DLLs that are not portable. We will likely eliminate that part
of the patch."
-Mike
Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
>
> Once again THANKS Pov team - the only sad news is the probably loss of the
> iso patch - can we keep some of it, the non Dll part? I espeacially like
> using it to create mathmatical surfaces, normal and color patterns.
>
> Keep up the good work
>
> Mick
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Oh, thanks for caring, Lance :) (did the survey, BTW)
I sure would miss the iso patch... But I understand the portability problem,
which is a priority.
And there's still quite a lot to do in povray without the iso patch...
The great news is that the pov-team is willing to integrate the patches in the
official version. I'd love to see Mike Hough's dispersion patch in 3.5, for
instance... Quite impressive this one.
Gilles Tran
Lance Birch wrote:
> Gilles will find that a big loss I'm sure... he does some really cool work
> with the ISO patch.
>
> --
> Lance.
>
> ---
> For the latest MAX plug-ins, images and much more, go to:
> The Zone - http://come.to/the.zone
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote:
>
>For a few extras I have the virtue of patience,
> so I can and will wait ...
But rickety old codgers like you and I (46) can only afford to wait just
so long...
Jerry Anning
cle### [at] dholcom
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Does anyone know whether there will be a Unix version of 3.5 or 4.0?
-Mark Gordon (feeling a little orphaned)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I thought UNIX was far beyond version 3.5 or 4 :~)
Jim
Mark Gordon wrote in message <368BC9A3.21D8828D@mailbag.com>...
>Does anyone know whether there will be a Unix version of 3.5 or 4.0?
>
>-Mark Gordon (feeling a little orphaned)
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
