After much tries, I still can't make anything that looks like a tree
(even remotely). Can anyone help me? I don't care for the method (pov
code or external utilities, texture maps or Lsystems, cardboard
cutouts,... ), except for unofficial compiles (anyway, I work with
3.1, so this can not be a problem at this time...).

I am after big and the most realistic trees possible, to make a forest
(lod thinking welcomed). Everything that I tried looked more like a
sapling than a mighty centenarian oak.

Any help welcome

Thank you, thank you, thank you,


Philippe

Post a reply to this message

Here of course I can't resist to recommend my TreeDesigner:

http://www.algonet.se/~jhubert/TreeDesigner

:-)

Johannes.

Post a reply to this message

Johannes Hubert wrote:

> Here of course I can't resist to recommend my TreeDesigner:
>
> http://www.algonet.se/~jhubert/TreeDesigner
>
> :-)
>
> Johannes.

I'll reccomend it too.

For anyone who makes trees, this program is not a utility, it's a
necessity.

I love it!

Simon
http://home.istar.ca/~sdevet

Post a reply to this message

Philippe Debar heeft geschreven in bericht <35ef08ae.0@news.povray.org>...
>After much tries, I still can't make anything that looks like a tree
>(even remotely). Can anyone help me? I don't care for the method

In my collection I keep something you might find useful. It bears a
reference to an 'official version' at
http://xenophon.home.mindspring.com/raytrace/include/
but I do not know if this pointer is still valid.
If not, let me know. I will mail it to you, or to the scenes.text group.

Frans

Post a reply to this message

F.VERBAAS heeft geschreven in bericht <35f04959.0@news.povray.org>...

>It bears a reference to an 'official version' at
>http://xenophon.home.mindspring.com/raytrace/include/
>but I do not know if this pointer is still valid.


I just checked. It is still valid, and contains much more than my version.

Frans

Post a reply to this message

Thanks everybody!

Post a reply to this message