POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : PovRay Google Trends Server Time
14 Jul 2025 01:09:35 EDT (-0400)
  PovRay Google Trends (Message 121 to 126 of 126)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: dick balaska
Subject: Re: PovRay Google Trends
Date: 18 Dec 2016 07:13:11
Message: <58567d57$1@news.povray.org>
Am 2016-11-17 17:23, also sprach clipka:

> I once spent hours beside a climate chamber to hunt for a bug that the
> hardware guys couldn't figure out.
>

I got heat because a custom Altera part I was driving failed with my 
software. The part worked just fine with the old software (which was 
magnitudes too slow for which it was thrown out).  Clearly my problem. 
After a month of begging, I finally got an afternoon with the hardware 
guy, who took 10 minutes to figure out that the output of an 8 input 
nand gate was ringing into an adjacent line causing false triggers 
elsewhere.  Didn't show up when the part was running at 10% capacity.

And then, and *then*, I got big heat because the i82557 SIO chip would 
start sending 0's. No errors, hardware checksum was ok. This was my 
problem too.  Years later, I found out that shiny new Linux 1.0.3 won't 
support network cards with this chip (3C507) because of this known problem.
Thanks for not mentioning that when you sold us on the buggy chip, intel.

-- 
dik


Post a reply to this message

From: dick balaska
Subject: Re: PovRay Google Trends
Date: 18 Dec 2016 07:35:59
Message: <585682af$1@news.povray.org>
Am 2016-11-14 09:22, also sprach Stephen Klebs:
> POV-Ray is still around, a pioneer in open
> source,

Once upon a time, at a show (Hamburg?), Richard Stallman, surrounded by 
his disciples, walked by the POV-Ray display and gave it a nice Roman 
Thumbs Down, because it wasn't GPL'd.
-- 
dik


Post a reply to this message

From: clipka
Subject: Re: PovRay Google Trends
Date: 18 Dec 2016 08:39:55
Message: <585691ab$1@news.povray.org>
Am 18.12.2016 um 13:13 schrieb dick balaska:
> Am 2016-11-17 17:23, also sprach clipka:
> 
>> I once spent hours beside a climate chamber to hunt for a bug that the
>> hardware guys couldn't figure out.
>>
> 
> I got heat because a custom Altera part I was driving failed with my
> software. The part worked just fine with the old software (which was
> magnitudes too slow for which it was thrown out).  Clearly my problem.
> After a month of begging, I finally got an afternoon with the hardware
> guy, who took 10 minutes to figure out that the output of an 8 input
> nand gate was ringing into an adjacent line causing false triggers
> elsewhere.  Didn't show up when the part was running at 10% capacity.

Ah, that sounds like fun!

> And then, and *then*, I got big heat because the i82557 SIO chip would
> start sending 0's. No errors, hardware checksum was ok. This was my
> problem too.  Years later, I found out that shiny new Linux 1.0.3 won't
> support network cards with this chip (3C507) because of this known problem.
> Thanks for not mentioning that when you sold us on the buggy chip, intel.

That reminds me of the fun the hardware guys had when it turned out that
the designated MCU for the product didn't like to be started up too
shortly after losing power.

And I mean, it *really* didn't like that. Not in an "I'll throw a
tantrum" way, nor the "I'll go sulking in the corner for a while" kind.

No, I mean the "over my dead body" sort of dislike.

Literally.

Not good in a car, where engine start can occasionally cause power to
cut out on less-important pieces of equipment like ours.

Since a revised MCU was nowhere to be seen, and turning to a different
product was a no-go that late in the development cycle, hardware guys
had to add an extra circuit to the board that would absolutely
positively prevent the device from turning back on for a while after
powerdown.

Which of course would haunt us later down the line, when the car
manufacturer (who had approved the stopgap measure) complained that the
device didn't power up fast enough in some new test scenarios.

I miss that kind of bullcrap. Really.


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: PovRay Google Trends
Date: 18 Dec 2016 09:46:48
Message: <5856a158$1@news.povray.org>
On 12/18/2016 12:13 PM, dick balaska wrote:
> I finally got an afternoon with the hardware guy, who took 10 minutes to
> figure out that

And he is probably saying that it took ages to get to talk to a S/ware guy.
Teamwork Rulz!

-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: William F Pokorny
Subject: Re: PovRay Google Trends
Date: 19 Dec 2016 09:51:16
Message: <5857f3e4$1@news.povray.org>
On 12/18/2016 07:36 AM, dick balaska wrote:
> Am 2016-11-14 09:22, also sprach Stephen Klebs:
>> POV-Ray is still around, a pioneer in open
>> source,
>
> Once upon a time, at a show (Hamburg?), Richard Stallman, surrounded by
> his disciples, walked by the POV-Ray display and gave it a nice Roman
> Thumbs Down, because it wasn't GPL'd.

:-) I'd not heard that story.

Bill P.


Post a reply to this message

From: Mike Horvath
Subject: Re: PovRay Google Trends
Date: 21 Dec 2016 00:10:11
Message: <585a0eb3$1@news.povray.org>
On 12/18/2016 7:36 AM, dick balaska wrote:
> Am 2016-11-14 09:22, also sprach Stephen Klebs:
>> POV-Ray is still around, a pioneer in open
>> source,
>
> Once upon a time, at a show (Hamburg?), Richard Stallman, surrounded by
> his disciples, walked by the POV-Ray display and gave it a nice Roman
> Thumbs Down, because it wasn't GPL'd.

LOL


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.