 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Samuel B." <stb### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
>
> There's a sweet spot I want to hit, something around the scale one might see
> depicted in a moon landing photo.
>
> I managed to get the scale closer to what I want (see attached image), but it's
> still a bit too close up.
>
Both of your images look really great, like the surface of asteroids--from the
photos that have been returned from spacecraft that have actually made landings.
Your result looks like an accumulation of loosely-held debris that has been
pulverized by micro-meteoroids over eons of time. Nice!
I still have a soft spot for those quaint old sci-fi movie depictions of
sharp-edged craggy mountains and craters on outer-space planets...but alas, that
appearance has been proven false.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Triplanar Mapping - to: Bald Eagle, Sam, and Kenneth
Date: 24 Jan 2024 02:09:31
Message: <65b0b7ab$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Op 23/01/2024 om 16:48 schreef Kenneth:
> "Samuel B." <stb### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>>
>> There's a sweet spot I want to hit, something around the scale one might see
>> depicted in a moon landing photo.
>>
>> I managed to get the scale closer to what I want (see attached image), but it's
>> still a bit too close up.
>>
> Both of your images look really great, like the surface of asteroids--from the
> photos that have been returned from spacecraft that have actually made landings.
> Your result looks like an accumulation of loosely-held debris that has been
> pulverized by micro-meteoroids over eons of time. Nice!
>
Yes, that was also my impression indeed.
> I still have a soft spot for those quaint old sci-fi movie depictions of
> sharp-edged craggy mountains and craters on outer-space planets...but alas, that
> appearance has been proven false.
>
Space is infinite, so maybe.... ;-)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Il 17/01/2024 04:40, Samuel B. ha scritto:
> "Samuel B." <stb### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>> it would appear that if you wish to rotate your objects you have to put up with
>
> some issues.
>
> There will always be some stretching, since not all objects will be boxes or
> superellipsoids aligned to one sole direction. You have to do your
> transformations before applying the triplanar mapping.
>
A beautiful effect, Sam!
This image is a candidate for my next wallpaper.
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
