POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : RMS Titanic Server Time
6 Oct 2024 08:54:25 EDT (-0400)
  RMS Titanic (Message 81 to 90 of 118)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: Ton
Subject: Re: RMS Titanic
Date: 29 Oct 2018 18:40:01
Message: <web.5bd78c1870fe53987678a7820@news.povray.org>
Wow, it's amazing how this thread curves and bends in all kind of unexpected
directions. The intellect, and interests, of this group of people is fantastic.
I apologize for decreasing the average IQ....

To Sven, it might be nice to place your steamboat next to Titanic, and compare
the size. I use one feet per POV-unit, but that shouldn't be a problem. How long
is your paddle steamer? Titanic was 882' 9", which is in our modern world 296
meter.

Building a ship in those days was not for the faint-hearted. Hard, dangerous,
extremely noisy work. When you see the photo's of Belfast's Harland & Wolff, and
see the small planks the had to walk on, and then hammer the rivets,
unbelievable that they managed it.

I want to finish the stern (thanks Stephen) and bow. There are still some loose
threads on the superstructure, the bridge needs some equipment, and then move
slowly down to the keel.

Cheers everybody
Ton.


Post a reply to this message

From: Sven Littkowski
Subject: Re: RMS Titanic
Date: 30 Oct 2018 18:31:50
Message: <5bd8dbd6$1@news.povray.org>
Okay. So, if you want to have the files of my still unfinished riverboat
(it later will become Public Domain), then let me have your e-mail
address. Remember not to write your e-mail address in a too straight
way, as there are countless spammer bots that try to capture e-mail
addresses.

---

http://www.avg.com


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: RMS Titanic
Date: 31 Oct 2018 08:15:51
Message: <5bd99cf7$1@news.povray.org>
On 29-10-2018 19:11, Norbert Kern wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> 
>> Reminds me of Christopher Richard Wynne Nevinson. One of his paintings
>> appears on the book cover of David Landes' "The Wealth and Poverty of
>> Nations". Good read.
> 
> 



> argument is the geographic situation, which favors Western world and China.....
> 

Both explanations are valid imo. It shows the complexity of interactions 
between human society (including religion and politics), natural 
resources, climate, etc. As it happens, I am currently re-reading Landes 
at the moment.


-- 
Thomas


Post a reply to this message

From: Norbert Kern
Subject: Re: RMS Titanic
Date: 31 Oct 2018 10:45:01
Message: <web.5bd9bf3370fe5398d42a2a0b0@news.povray.org>
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>
> Both explanations are valid imo. It shows the complexity of interactions
> between human society (including religion and politics), natural
> resources, climate, etc. As it happens, I am currently re-reading Landes
> at the moment.


Once again I see some similarities in our interests and attitudes....

Norbert


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: RMS Titanic
Date: 1 Nov 2018 04:13:58
Message: <5bdab5c6$1@news.povray.org>
On 31-10-2018 15:41, Norbert Kern wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>>
>> Both explanations are valid imo. It shows the complexity of interactions
>> between human society (including religion and politics), natural
>> resources, climate, etc. As it happens, I am currently re-reading Landes
>> at the moment.
> 
> 
> Once again I see some similarities in our interests and attitudes....
> 

<grin>

Yes, it seems so. We are not alone. There is still some hope for the 
planet... ;-)

-- 
Thomas


Post a reply to this message

From: Ton
Subject: Re: RMS Titanic
Date: 1 Nov 2018 19:20:01
Message: <web.5bdb894470fe53984ef93cd10@news.povray.org>
Sven Littkowski <I### [at] SvenLittkowskiname> wrote:
> Okay. So, if you want to have the files of my still unfinished riverboat
> (it later will become Public Domain), then let me have your e-mail
> address. Remember not to write your e-mail address in a too straight
> way, as there are countless spammer bots that try to capture e-mail
> addresses.
>
> ---

> http://www.avg.com

Hallo Sven,

my username is tonkiwi, and the domain is the gmail community.
Might be a nice picture to have those two completely different ships together.

Cheers
Ton.


Post a reply to this message

From: Ton
Subject: Re: RMS Titanic
Date: 6 Nov 2018 04:10:02
Message: <web.5be1595e70fe5398a0d25f1d0@news.povray.org>
Here is a first try with Sven's Mississippi steamer, and my steamship Titanic.
Both models aren't finished yet, a Work In Progress you might say, but here they
are.
The scale is the same, Sven's model is 1m/1unit, mine is 1'/1unit, so I scaled
the riverboat by 100/30.48 (12 inch, 1 foot, I am getting clever with the
imperial system!).

Cheers
Ton


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'steamer.png' (1372 KB)

Preview of image 'steamer.png'
steamer.png


 

From: clipka
Subject: Re: RMS Titanic
Date: 6 Nov 2018 04:22:13
Message: <5be15d45$1@news.povray.org>
Am 06.11.2018 um 10:05 schrieb Ton:
> Here is a first try with Sven's Mississippi steamer, and my steamship Titanic.
> Both models aren't finished yet, a Work In Progress you might say, but here they
> are.
> The scale is the same, Sven's model is 1m/1unit, mine is 1'/1unit, so I scaled
> the riverboat by 100/30.48 (12 inch, 1 foot, I am getting clever with the
> imperial system!).

Are you sure the scale is right? The riverboat seems rather oversized to 
me, given how humongously large the Titanic allegedly was.


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: RMS Titanic
Date: 6 Nov 2018 05:37:29
Message: <5be16ee9$1@news.povray.org>
On 06/11/2018 09:22, clipka wrote:
> Am 06.11.2018 um 10:05 schrieb Ton:
>> Here is a first try with Sven's Mississippi steamer, and my steamship 
>> Titanic.
>> Both models aren't finished yet, a Work In Progress you might say, but 
>> here they
>> are.
>> The scale is the same, Sven's model is 1m/1unit, mine is 1'/1unit


Is that one foot per Pov unit?

, so
>> I scaled
>> the riverboat by 100/30.48 (12 inch, 1 foot, I am getting clever with the
>> imperial system!).
> 
> Are you sure the scale is right? The riverboat seems rather oversized to 
> me, given how humongously large the Titanic allegedly was.


Everything is bigger than life. In those Southern States. ;)

I reckon that the largest of the riverboats would be about a third the 
length of the Titanic.


Titanic: 882'
Mississippi steamboat: 300'


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steamboats_of_the_Mississippi#Construction_of_the_vessels



-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Ton
Subject: Re: RMS Titanic
Date: 6 Nov 2018 17:40:00
Message: <web.5be217f970fe5398a0d25f1d0@news.povray.org>
Yes, clipka, according to Sven as well, in the pov-file, that steamer is over
100 meters long. Titanic was close to 300 meters, so those Mississippi paddle
steamers were really big.
I'll render a second image, with Titanic in the front, and the steamer behind
it. I think this composition gives an advantage to the steamer.

Cheers
Ton.


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.