 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks for your comment and the suggestion for the interior. I'll think about
it.
Alain <kua### [at] videotron ca> wrote:
> > After cloth simulation, another element of my next image, a bread loaf. The
> > crust please me enough, but I'll work a little more on the bread.
> > Comments welcome.
> >
>
> The crust look prety convincing.
> It that bread is seen from a distance,maybe partly obscured by other
> objects, it can be qualified as good enough. It's not good enough for a
> closeup.
> For the interior, you should use an isosurface using the crackle pattern.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks for your comment. I'll try do my best to make it more appealing.
Thanks for the link, but I'm not using Blender.
"Theogott" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> Honestly i would not eat yours.
> It reminds me when we was shopping in USA and we found some cookies
> which said on the poackage
> "NO WHEAT"
> "NO SUGAR"
> "NO FAT"
>
> so we wondered what might be inside, We bought some and tried one of them.
> And then we gave the whole plastic-cookies back.
> Thats phantastic in USA, you canb eat something and then give it back.
>
> Doesn't work here.
> A better version, that really llooks like Bread (using Blender) you can see
> here.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrP1-ZJz3GA
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3-3-2016 14:09, BayashiPascal wrote:
> After cloth simulation, another element of my next image, a bread loaf. The
> crust please me enough, but I'll work a little more on the bread.
> Comments welcome.
>
Reminds me of my image back in 2009: Vanitas. I seem to remember that
the bread was not created by me. I shall try to dig up the code.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'vanitas_final.png' (3571 KB)
Preview of image 'vanitas_final.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 4-3-2016 8:53, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> Reminds me of my image back in 2009: Vanitas. I seem to remember that
> the bread was not created by me. I shall try to dig up the code.
>
It is an image_map used as a height_field. Created by StephenS for a
Moray tribute back in 2003. I don't think that is the way you want to go?
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 04.03.2016 um 08:53 schrieb Thomas de Groot:
> On 3-3-2016 14:09, BayashiPascal wrote:
>> After cloth simulation, another element of my next image, a bread
>> loaf. The
>> crust please me enough, but I'll work a little more on the bread.
>> Comments welcome.
>>
>
> Reminds me of my image back in 2009: Vanitas. I seem to remember that
> the bread was not created by me. I shall try to dig up the code.
You Dutch have an advantage there: The stuff you folks put your butter
onto isn't real bread anyway :P
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 4-3-2016 9:03, clipka wrote:
> You Dutch have an advantage there: The stuff you folks put your butter
> onto isn't real bread anyway :P
>
Do we have that in common then with the US (see above)? ;-)
Fortunately, there is also some /real/ bread around, and when it's not
you make it yourself.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yes, I've used a different approach...
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 4-3-2016 8:53, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> > Reminds me of my image back in 2009: Vanitas. I seem to remember that
> > the bread was not created by me. I shall try to dig up the code.
> >
> It is an image_map used as a height_field. Created by StephenS for a
> Moray tribute back in 2003. I don't think that is the way you want to go?
>
> --
> Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> Reminds me of my image back in 2009: Vanitas.
> Thomas
Those are some really good looking cards. I spent a lot of time last year
trying to make some decent looking whist cards, and they're not half as good as
those.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 4-3-2016 9:03, clipka wrote:
> > You Dutch have an advantage there: The stuff you folks put your butter
> > onto isn't real bread anyway :P
> >
>
> Do we have that in common then with the US (see above)? ;-)
We're the fattest white-majority country in the world. (Some Pacific islands
(which import food from the USA), Caribbean islands (which used to supply sugar
to the USA), and Arab countries (which import money from the USA) have us beat
out.) This is why we've had to take steps:
First, we cut out fat. (We've only gotten fatter since.)
Then we cut out the sugar. (Net result is fat people calling Michelle Obama
transgender.)
Now everyone's blaming gluten, so wheat's gotta go. (Anyone taking bets?)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 04.03.2016 um 16:36 schrieb Cousin Ricky:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>> On 4-3-2016 9:03, clipka wrote:
>>> You Dutch have an advantage there: The stuff you folks put your butter
>>> onto isn't real bread anyway :P
>>>
>>
>> Do we have that in common then with the US (see above)? ;-)
>
> We're the fattest white-majority country in the world. (Some Pacific islands
> (which import food from the USA), Caribbean islands (which used to supply sugar
> to the USA), and Arab countries (which import money from the USA) have us beat
> out.) This is why we've had to take steps:
>
> First, we cut out fat. (We've only gotten fatter since.)
>
> Then we cut out the sugar. (Net result is fat people calling Michelle Obama
> transgender.)
>
> Now everyone's blaming gluten, so wheat's gotta go. (Anyone taking bets?)
You're gonna fart more frequently? :P
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
