POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Subsurface experiment Server Time
28 May 2024 23:30:41 EDT (-0400)
  Subsurface experiment (Message 8 to 17 of 27)  
<<< Previous 7 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: Bruno Cabasson
Subject: Re: Subsurface experiment
Date: 2 Feb 2016 11:45:01
Message: <web.56b0dca21c6339447451ecd10@news.povray.org>
"Bruno Cabasson" <bru### [at] cabassoncom> wrote:
> Sven Littkowski <jam### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
> > Hi Brune,
> >
> > a warm re-welcome back here!
> >
> > What you're writing about your projects is very interesting. Do you have
> > any images you can share with us here? I am seriously curious.
>
> @Christoph : sorry for this misundestanding. As I was mostly absent those last
> years, you had good reasons not to "know about me"... Glad you know my name, but
> I cannot say I am (was) such a skilled and productive POVer as some of the main
> people here. I don't know myself if really am back ... Currently rendering
> revisited patio_radio : big areas and small crevices = radiosity challenge.
>
> Concerning TerraPOV, I am not currently in situation to give the project another
> impulsion. But who knows... All I can show here some examples of cloudscapes I
> could save from the disaster. During the last 2 or 3 years, I posted some of
> them, when it was relevant for the thread in question.
>
> However, here is one of my favorites (I am afraid I already posted it).
>
>
> PS: one of my current personal projects is about a full Atkinson cycle engine
> .... Not much to do with ray tracing, only for modelization purposes. But I still
> am at Proof Of Concept stage.

This one is also acceptable.


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'cscape3.png' (281 KB)

Preview of image 'cscape3.png'
cscape3.png


 

From: William F Pokorny
Subject: Re: Subsurface experiment
Date: 2 Feb 2016 12:18:18
Message: <56b0e4da$1@news.povray.org>
On 02/02/2016 04:03 AM, Bruno Cabasson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For the fun, I revisited the shipped-in 'subsurface.pov' scene. No sky_sphere,
> floor is pure white (in order to check radiosity), light is situated at the
> wick.
>
> Wanted to share.
>
> Bruno
>
Hello Bruno,
Good to see you again posting work and nice SS/radiosity image.

It happens I played with your 2006 elliptical_torus blob macro a couple 
weeks ago for the first time! :-)

Bill P.


Post a reply to this message

From: Bruno Cabasson
Subject: Re: Subsurface experiment
Date: 2 Feb 2016 12:25:00
Message: <web.56b0e62b1c6339447451ecd10@news.povray.org>
William F Pokorny <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> On 02/02/2016 04:03 AM, Bruno Cabasson wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > For the fun, I revisited the shipped-in 'subsurface.pov' scene. No sky_sphere,
> > floor is pure white (in order to check radiosity), light is situated at the
> > wick.
> >
> > Wanted to share.
> >
> > Bruno
> >
> Hello Bruno,
> Good to see you again posting work and nice SS/radiosity image.
>
> It happens I played with your 2006 elliptical_torus blob macro a couple
> weeks ago for the first time! :-)
>
> Bill P.

You said 2006 ? OMG ....


Post a reply to this message

From: clipka
Subject: Re: Subsurface experiment
Date: 2 Feb 2016 14:43:28
Message: <56b106e0$1@news.povray.org>
Am 02.02.2016 um 16:40 schrieb Bruno Cabasson:

> However, here is one of my favorites (I am afraid I already posted it).

I like the warm hue of the image. And the clouds look pretty good, too.


Post a reply to this message

From: Sven Littkowski
Subject: Re: Subsurface experiment
Date: 2 Feb 2016 18:45:04
Message: <56b13f80$1@news.povray.org>
And sun rays bursting through the clouds. Well-done! All images. :-)

And thanks for sharing! If you got more, please add them.


Post a reply to this message

From: dick balaska
Subject: Re: Subsurface experiment
Date: 2 Feb 2016 21:27:57
Message: <56b165ad$1@news.povray.org>
On 2/2/2016 9:29 AM, clipka wrote:

> Seems like I have been misunderstood: What I meant was, "I don't know
> whether /you/ like it, but..." ;)
>
> Your name /is/ familiar to me.

I read your words odd too.
"I don't know you, ..."  Hmm, that seems an _odd_ thing for clipka to 
say.  Rescanning...
"I don't know about you, ..."  Oh! That makes a lot more sense.


Post a reply to this message

From: Paolo Gibellini
Subject: Re: Subsurface experiment
Date: 3 Feb 2016 06:03:40
Message: <56b1de8c$1@news.povray.org>
Bruno Cabasson wrote on 02/02/2016 16.40:
> However, here is one of my favorites (I am afraid I already posted it).
>

Hi Bruno, it's been a long time... please, keep to post interesting 
images when is possible!
I like a lot these clouds, they resembles somehow to long hairs.

Paolo


Post a reply to this message

From: Bruno Cabasson
Subject: Re: Subsurface experiment
Date: 3 Feb 2016 16:30:10
Message: <web.56b2713b1c633944f94e287a0@news.povray.org>
Paolo Gibellini <p.g### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> Bruno Cabasson wrote on 02/02/2016 16.40:
> > However, here is one of my favorites (I am afraid I already posted it).
> >
>
> Hi Bruno, it's been a long time... please, keep to post interesting
> images when is possible!
> I like a lot these clouds, they resembles somehow to long hairs.
>
> Paolo

I once played with photons. Tons of photons. And, you know what ? I haved de
code !


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'extreme_optics.jpg' (91 KB)

Preview of image 'extreme_optics.jpg'
extreme_optics.jpg


 

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Subsurface experiment
Date: 3 Feb 2016 17:12:54
Message: <56b27b66$1@news.povray.org>
On 2/3/2016 9:29 PM, Bruno Cabasson wrote:
> I once played with photons. Tons of photons. And, you know what ? I haved de
> code !

That is just showing off!

:-)

-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Bruno Cabasson
Subject: Re: Subsurface experiment
Date: 3 Feb 2016 17:40:01
Message: <web.56b2808d1c63394471e7dd070@news.povray.org>
Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> On 2/3/2016 9:29 PM, Bruno Cabasson wrote:
> > I once played with photons. Tons of photons. And, you know what ? I haved de
> > code !
>
> That is just showing off!
>
> :-)
>
> --
>
> Regards
>      Stephen

If I remember well, this one costed something like 13 million media photons, and
more. I was limited by the memory of the machine I used (4Gb only). Maye I will
try on a better machine.

B.


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 7 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.