Stephen <mca### [at] aolDOTcom> wrote:
>

> thicker as the drop moves downwards.
>
> --
>
> Best Regards,
>  Stephen

Yes, currently my trails are all one thickness but they should get thicker as
they get nearer the droplet, I need to put some more thought into how I create
these.

Thanks,

Sean

Post a reply to this message

s.day wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolDOTcom> wrote:

>> thicker as the drop moves downwards.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>  Stephen
> 
> Yes, currently my trails are all one thickness but they should get thicker as
> they get nearer the droplet, I need to put some more thought into how I create
> these.
> 




-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

"s.day" <s.d### [at] uelacuk> schreef in bericht 
news:web.4b19aac6edcf7d1efdd3b49e0@news.povray.org...
>
> I have tried scaling (not put that much effort in so far though) and the 
> blobs
> seem to just disappear when I make them thinner. I will find the thinnest
> setting I can get away with and keep them visible. Of course it could be 
> because
> I am scaling each component rather than the whole blob which would 
> probably make
> a difference...
>
I think scaling the whole blob will do the trick. What you also can do I 
guess, is cut off the part of the blob lying against the pane, in a 
difference or intersection. Your blob becomes thinner too that way and you 
simulate the *stickyness* of the water drop on the glass surface.

Thomas

Post a reply to this message