POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : More LEGOs... Server Time
13 Nov 2024 17:45:50 EST (-0500)
  More LEGOs... (Message 1 to 6 of 6)  
From: triple r
Subject: More LEGOs...
Date: 1 Jul 2007 14:00:02
Message: <web.4687eaca8015fac0efa9f3280@news.povray.org>
Inspired by the other post, I thought I'd try my hand at LDRAW.  I was more
impressed with the number of pieces than with the interface, but it's still
a very well-done program.  Just had to get my bi-monthly POV fix.

 - Ricky


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'bucket.jpg' (58 KB)

Preview of image 'bucket.jpg'
bucket.jpg


 

From: Samuel Benge
Subject: Re: More LEGOs...
Date: 1 Jul 2007 14:30:44
Message: <4687f2d4$1@news.povray.org>
triple_r wrote:
> Inspired by the other post, I thought I'd try my hand at LDRAW.  I was more
> impressed with the number of pieces than with the interface, but it's still
> a very well-done program.  Just had to get my bi-monthly POV fix.
> 
>  - Ricky

Good one. I still prefer the old technic pieces over the newer ones.

How was the memory consumption on this? I've only got 256 megs of RAM. I
hope it is enough to produce models of the same (or higher) complexity 
shown in your render.

~Sam


Post a reply to this message

From: Orchid XP v3
Subject: Re: More LEGOs...
Date: 1 Jul 2007 15:04:30
Message: <4687fabe$1@news.povray.org>
You *know* you've been raytracing far too long when you look at a heap 
of dirt and go "wow, that looks really realistic..."


Post a reply to this message

From: triple r
Subject: Re: More LEGOs...
Date: 1 Jul 2007 16:40:01
Message: <web.468810c5fd71d53fefa9f3280@news.povray.org>
Samuel Benge <stb### [at] THIShotmailcom> wrote:
> triple_r wrote:
> > Inspired by the other post, I thought I'd try my hand at LDRAW.  I was more
> > impressed with the number of pieces than with the interface, but it's still
> > a very well-done program.  Just had to get my bi-monthly POV fix.
> >
> >  - Ricky
>
> Good one. I still prefer the old technic pieces over the newer ones.
>
> How was the memory consumption on this? I've only got 256 megs of RAM. I
> hope it is enough to produce models of the same (or higher) complexity
> shown in your render.
>
> ~Sam

Yeah, they definitely sold out and got away from complex models made of
simple pieces.  I guess I picked a good time to reach adolescence.

As for the RAM usage, I don't have the statistics on hand, but I can tell
you it'd be the radiosity that gets you on this one, not the LEGO's.  I was
very pleased with the POV support.  Most POV export commands spit out a huge
mesh that renders quickly but is impossible to edit.  This one builds all
the pieces individually then assembles the model from copies.  Very easy to
edit.  As far I as I know that translates into relatively efficient RAM
usage too, but I could be way off.  If nothing else, the POV file is 660 kB
so you're not looking at a giant mesh.

 - Ricky


Post a reply to this message

From: Charles C
Subject: Re: More LEGOs...
Date: 2 Jul 2007 02:25:02
Message: <web.46889901fd71d53f772850b00@news.povray.org>
Wide images with a lot of space like this beg for a caption.... "Got dirt?
Get Techics"  (Ok maybe something else....)

That is a very nice pile of dirt too btw!

Charles


Post a reply to this message

From: Arno
Subject: Re: More LEGOs...
Date: 2 Jul 2007 08:55:02
Message: <web.4688f3abfd71d53f46c8f1d00@news.povray.org>
Hahaha.... Nice!! Very realistic!

Indeed the pile of dirt is also very real...

If you really wanna get into rendering Lego, there's a specific newsgroup
where you can exchange ideas with other enthousiasts:
http://news.lugnet.com/cad/ray/


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.