 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 22-3-2018 13:50, Ive wrote:
> Am 3/22/2018 um 13:07 schrieb Thomas de Groot:
>> Oh, the garden can wait. IC is much more important than either
>> marriage or gardens, isn't it! ;-)
>>
> Yeah, sure!
>
>>
>> Well, I shall expect a new version by tomorrow then... ;-)
>>
> You misunderstood. The maintained site is already up and running and IC
> 1.1.7 64-bit ready to download.
>
>
Wow. I call that faster than light! Thanks a lot!
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka <ano### [at] anonymous org> wrote:
> Am 21.03.2018 um 11:52 schrieb Ive:
>
> > And a general note to everybody who's posting images to theses
> > newsgroups: please make sure your JPEG image contains a ICC profile.
> > Since about 2 months Firefox and Thunderbird have full color management
> > enabled by default. Chrome and Opera do the same since quite a while,
> [...]
>
> ...the W3C officially recommends sRGB for all web content, so that's what
> browsers should default to if an ICC profile is not embedded.
>
> Also, a lot of images posted here are rendered with POV-Ray, which
> currently does not embed an ICC profile. So to comply with your request,
> each and every image would have to be post-processed before posting,
> which I consider unreasonable.
> [...]
I'm coming late to this conversation; sorry.
This surprising situation looks like a very big 'can of worms' that needs
further discussion, maybe in a separate newsgroup thread. It goes to the heart
of what we can expect our images to look like on other computers/monitors.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 20-3-2018 8:43, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> Once in a while, I like to revisit an older scene and remodel it to
> current standards and my changing insights and skills. I did this lately
> with my entry to the TC-RTC back in 2008: "N". I still want to change
> some elements but the comparison over ten years of using POV-Ray are
> notable. Left, is the entry of 2008; right, the new version.
>
Following the comments, I re-assessed different elements, in particular
de-saturating some of the image_maps used. I also gave dynamic t-shirts
to the girls instead of the conforming ones in the original.
While re-processing through Poser, changing the facial expressions of
the girls, the flag was changed. The letter 'N' may not really be
visible any more but this version clears the head of Cathy which I find
better.
As far as I am concerned, my final version.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'n_2018_05.png' (799 KB)
Preview of image 'n_2018_05.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot wrote on 22/04/2018 09:36:
> Following the comments, I re-assessed different elements, in particular
> de-saturating some of the image_maps used. I also gave dynamic t-shirts
> to the girls instead of the conforming ones in the original.
>
> While re-processing through Poser, changing the facial expressions of
> the girls, the flag was changed. The letter 'N' may not really be
> visible any more but this version clears the head of Cathy which I find
> better.
>
> As far as I am concerned, my final version.
>
The expression are less solemn, but the t-shirts are really well done.
A nice version.
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 23-4-2018 15:57, Paolo Gibellini wrote:
>
> The expression are less solemn, but the t-shirts are really well done.
> A nice version.
> Paolo
Thanks Paolo. I changed the expressions mainly because they were at the
limit of what Poser can do correctly. I preferred to backtrack a bit.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
