 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/2/2016 10:18 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> On 10/26/2016 10:17 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>> i'm shooting for porcelain
>
> how about jade instead ...
>
I like it. :)
How about a bit more colour variation? (I know I am a pleb with cheap
tastes ;) )
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/2/2016 7:06 AM, Stephen wrote:
> On 11/2/2016 10:18 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>> On 10/26/2016 10:17 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>>> i'm shooting for porcelain
>>
>> how about jade instead ...
>>
>
> I like it. :)
> How about a bit more colour variation?
there already is a gradient y (4 color) but 18hrs later (subsurface)
it's not as apparent as i would have liked ... maybe i should throw some
yellow into the mix
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Oh, take the bull by the horns already and just do a nice procedural opal.
:D
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Holsenback <spa### [at] nothanks net> wrote:
> On 11/2/2016 7:06 AM, Stephen wrote:
> > On 11/2/2016 10:18 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> >> On 10/26/2016 10:17 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> >>> i'm shooting for porcelain
> >>
> >> how about jade instead ...
> >>
> >
> > I like it. :)
> > How about a bit more colour variation?
>
> there already is a gradient y (4 color) but 18hrs later (subsurface)
> it's not as apparent as i would have liked ... maybe i should throw some
> yellow into the mix
Probably more to do with the usual perfection problem, most jade I've seen tends
to have inclusions or variations. I like these knots regardless of that,
especially since I'm attracted to clean appearing perfection.
On that note I could find a tiny black crescent thing right at the left side of
the platform which doesn't seem to belong, so I couldn't help myself mentioning
that.
On the subject of jade... I have been trying the "baked map" textures from Jaime
Vives Piqueres 4 years ago. First time I've been doing so, and wanted to try
jade for the dragon mesh. Picture posted here. I simply put a small turbulent
and skew scaled granite color_map on it and let subsurface scattering do the
rest. Also has a thick layer of dark dust.
Reason I'm showing this one of mine here is because jade varies so much. I'm not
sure how homogeneous some real objects are but apparently some can be without
much of any variation in color or substance. My attempt was to get small changes
throughout, except maybe it looks too plastic...?
Enjoyed looking at your scenes here anyhow.
Bob
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'jade dragon.png' (167 KB)
Preview of image 'jade dragon.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/2/2016 12:00 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> On 11/2/2016 7:06 AM, Stephen wrote:
>> On 11/2/2016 10:18 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>>> On 10/26/2016 10:17 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>>>> i'm shooting for porcelain
>>>
>>> how about jade instead ...
>>>
>>
>> I like it. :)
>> How about a bit more colour variation?
>
> there already is a gradient y (4 color) but 18hrs later (subsurface)
> it's not as apparent as i would have liked ... maybe i should throw some
> yellow into the mix
>
It is difficult. I did a nice one of Lucy, the grave monument, with one
of the early SSLT betas. I have not used it much since.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/2/2016 7:06 AM, Stephen wrote:
> On 11/2/2016 10:18 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>> On 10/26/2016 10:17 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>>> i'm shooting for porcelain
>>
>> how about jade instead ...
>>
>
> I like it. :)
> How about a bit more colour variation? (I know I am a pleb with cheap
> tastes ;) )
mo betta? ... also changed the pose a bit and darkened it some as in
"after hours"
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'jadeknot.png' (706 KB)
Preview of image 'jadeknot.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/19/2016 3:48 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> On 11/2/2016 7:06 AM, Stephen wrote:
>> On 11/2/2016 10:18 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>>> On 10/26/2016 10:17 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>>>> i'm shooting for porcelain
>>>
>>> how about jade instead ...
>>>
>>
>> I like it. :)
>> How about a bit more colour variation? (I know I am a pleb with cheap
>> tastes ;) )
>
> mo betta? ... also changed the pose a bit and darkened it some as in
> "after hours"
>
Yes, I like that. :)
> "after hours"
? ^_^
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Holsenback <spa### [at] nothanksnet> wrote:
> mo betta? ... also changed the pose a bit and darkened it some as in
> "after hours"
Only problem now is that I imagine it doing twisting motions and the patterned
tiles rotating... animation possible? Or is that asking too much? :}
The image along with my imagination does okay enough if you can't do that so
don't feel pressured.
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/19/2016 11:57 AM, Stephen wrote:
> On 11/19/2016 3:48 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>> On 11/2/2016 7:06 AM, Stephen wrote:
>>> On 11/2/2016 10:18 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>>>> On 10/26/2016 10:17 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>>>>> i'm shooting for porcelain
>>>>
>>>> how about jade instead ...
>>>>
>>>
>>> I like it. :)
>>> How about a bit more colour variation? (I know I am a pleb with cheap
>>> tastes ;) )
>>
>> mo betta? ... also changed the pose a bit and darkened it some as in
>> "after hours"
>>
>
> Yes, I like that. :)
>
>> "after hours"
>
> ? ^_^
like in a gallery after it's closed. i'm also working on a monochrome
version with scattering media.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/20/2016 3:14 AM, omniverse wrote:
> Jim Holsenback <spa### [at] nothanksnet> wrote:
>> mo betta? ... also changed the pose a bit and darkened it some as in
>> "after hours"
>
> Only problem now is that I imagine it doing twisting motions and the patterned
> tiles rotating... animation possible? Or is that asking too much? :}
> The image along with my imagination does okay enough if you can't do that so
> don't feel pressured.
lol don't worry i won't ... area lights + subsurface pushed the render
time into the 10 hr range on my machine, so i can't see any animations
happening on this one
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
