StephenS <nom### [at] nomailcom> wrote:
> On 03/08/2016 3:15 AM, omniverse wrote:
> > Found 3 in "b".
> > Not sure I have all 3's from "c" picture, unless 3 is all. Wouldn't want to be
> > timed on this anyway. Makes me feel slow.
> >
> Was trying to make 2 in "b", with 1 more not provable.
>
> Stephen S

Hmmmm. I'm sure I found 3 things that would be different, aside from the actual
view being changed.
One being a letter, another a number, and I'll leave the 3rd for people to keep
guessing.

Post a reply to this message

Am 03.08.2016 um 16:08 schrieb omniverse:
> StephenS <nom### [at] nomailcom> wrote:
>> On 03/08/2016 3:15 AM, omniverse wrote:
>>> Found 3 in "b".
>>> Not sure I have all 3's from "c" picture, unless 3 is all. Wouldn't want to be
>>> timed on this anyway. Makes me feel slow.
>>>
>> Was trying to make 2 in "b", with 1 more not provable.
>>
>> Stephen S
> 
> Hmmmm. I'm sure I found 3 things that would be different, aside from the actual
> view being changed.
> One being a letter, another a number, and I'll leave the 3rd for people to keep
> guessing.

I've found 4 errors by now (again aside from the difference in
perspective), presuming the two cubes on the right are supposed to have
the numbers 1 to 6 on them and satisfy the typical convention for the
arrangement of the numbers.

Plus one more error if the letters "SJS" are supposed to be part of the
scene ;)

Post a reply to this message

Am 03.08.2016 um 16:33 schrieb clipka:

> I've found 4 errors by now (again aside from the difference in
> perspective), presuming the two cubes on the right are supposed to have
> the numbers 1 to 6 on them and satisfy the typical convention for the
> arrangement of the numbers.

Then again, no -- they obviously don't follow the typical convention. So
back to 3 errors.

Post a reply to this message

On 8/3/2016 7:56 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>> I was sure the X block was a hint to do cross-eyed 3D! And it really
>>> makes for 3
>>> differences that way.
>>>
>>
>> Too subtle for this group, I'm afraid. :-)
>
> My eyes are too old to be able to do that anymore.

You are not the only one.

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Le 16-08-01 à 21:36, StephenS a écrit :
> A test of a new kind of picture I would like to start making sometimes.
> Easy enough to not need answers provided.
>
> For this one, a difference between two pictures.
>
> Comments welcome:
>
> Stephen S

Found the 3 differences, 2 just jumped at me, and the last eluded me for 
a time. Nice trick in that last one.


Alain

Post a reply to this message