 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 02/08/2016 8:15 PM, StephenS wrote:
> On 01/08/2016 9:36 PM, StephenS wrote:
>> A test of a new kind of picture I would like to start making sometimes.
>> Easy enough to not need answers provided.
>>
>> For this one, a difference between two pictures.
>>
>> Comments welcome:
>>
>> Stephen S
> Maybe I should use, a difference between two scenes?
>
> Comments welcome:
>
> Stephen S
And picture.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'picturepuzzeltestb.png' (245 KB)
Preview of image 'picturepuzzeltestb.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 01/08/2016 9:36 PM, StephenS wrote:
> A test of a new kind of picture I would like to start making sometimes.
> Easy enough to not need answers provided.
>
> For this one, a difference between two pictures.
>
> Comments welcome:
>
> Stephen S
How many three's.
Comments welcome:
Stephen S
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'characture_set0004.png' (168 KB)
Preview of image 'characture_set0004.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2-8-2016 19:03, Stephen wrote:
> On 8/2/2016 5:02 PM, omniverse wrote:
>> Stephen <mca### [at] aol com> wrote:
>>> On 8/2/2016 3:13 AM, omniverse wrote:
>>>> Got to ask. Is it just my eyes or is the only 3D thing the block on
>>>> the right?
>>>> Because somehow I'm not seeing anything else as 3D, with any depth.
>>>> Like I said,
>>>> maybe it's my 3D visual interpretation messing up.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry if I'm spoiling the puzzle already!
>>>>
>>>
>>> It's not a 3d picture for once. There are two similar images and you
>>> have to spot the differences.
>>
>> I was sure the X block was a hint to do cross-eyed 3D! And it really
>> makes for 3
>> differences that way.
>>
>
> Too subtle for this group, I'm afraid. :-)
My eyes are too old to be able to do that anymore.
>
>> I suggest people give that a look anyhow.
>>
>
> I tried but the image is too large for me to get it to work.
>
As far as I can tell, the differences have nothing to do with 3D.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Found 3 in "b".
Not sure I have all 3's from "c" picture, unless 3 is all. Wouldn't want to be
timed on this anyway. Makes me feel slow.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 03/08/2016 3:15 AM, omniverse wrote:
> Found 3 in "b".
> Not sure I have all 3's from "c" picture, unless 3 is all. Wouldn't want to be
> timed on this anyway. Makes me feel slow.
>
Was trying to make 2 in "b", with 1 more not provable.
Stephen S
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
StephenS <nom### [at] nomailcom> wrote:
> On 03/08/2016 3:15 AM, omniverse wrote:
> > Found 3 in "b".
> > Not sure I have all 3's from "c" picture, unless 3 is all. Wouldn't want to be
> > timed on this anyway. Makes me feel slow.
> >
> Was trying to make 2 in "b", with 1 more not provable.
>
> Stephen S
Hmmmm. I'm sure I found 3 things that would be different, aside from the actual
view being changed.
One being a letter, another a number, and I'll leave the 3rd for people to keep
guessing.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 03.08.2016 um 16:08 schrieb omniverse:
> StephenS <nom### [at] nomailcom> wrote:
>> On 03/08/2016 3:15 AM, omniverse wrote:
>>> Found 3 in "b".
>>> Not sure I have all 3's from "c" picture, unless 3 is all. Wouldn't want to be
>>> timed on this anyway. Makes me feel slow.
>>>
>> Was trying to make 2 in "b", with 1 more not provable.
>>
>> Stephen S
>
> Hmmmm. I'm sure I found 3 things that would be different, aside from the actual
> view being changed.
> One being a letter, another a number, and I'll leave the 3rd for people to keep
> guessing.
I've found 4 errors by now (again aside from the difference in
perspective), presuming the two cubes on the right are supposed to have
the numbers 1 to 6 on them and satisfy the typical convention for the
arrangement of the numbers.
Plus one more error if the letters "SJS" are supposed to be part of the
scene ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 03.08.2016 um 16:33 schrieb clipka:
> I've found 4 errors by now (again aside from the difference in
> perspective), presuming the two cubes on the right are supposed to have
> the numbers 1 to 6 on them and satisfy the typical convention for the
> arrangement of the numbers.
Then again, no -- they obviously don't follow the typical convention. So
back to 3 errors.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 8/3/2016 7:56 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>> I was sure the X block was a hint to do cross-eyed 3D! And it really
>>> makes for 3
>>> differences that way.
>>>
>>
>> Too subtle for this group, I'm afraid. :-)
>
> My eyes are too old to be able to do that anymore.
You are not the only one.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 16-08-01 à 21:36, StephenS a écrit :
> A test of a new kind of picture I would like to start making sometimes.
> Easy enough to not need answers provided.
>
> For this one, a difference between two pictures.
>
> Comments welcome:
>
> Stephen S
Found the 3 differences, 2 just jumped at me, and the last eluded me for
a time. Nice trick in that last one.
Alain
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
