 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
El 27/04/16 a las 09:08, Paolo Gibellini escribió:
> I like a lot this one!
Thanks!
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Gorgeous ! I find them an impressionism touch...
Thanks. The "impressionism" touch is nice, but to be frank is only the
result of not being realistic enough... :(
> Can't wait to see the composition with the sea.
>
I still have some things to try with the clouds, but I will let it
render this evening, as I've to leave for some hours... will post tonight.
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 04/26/2016 12:56 PM, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> El 26/04/16 a las 15:52, William F Pokorny escribió:
>> Impressive - though am I correct there are some artifacts in the
>> right part of the center top plume? Was it run with AA ?
>
> You have a good eye... I had to zoom several times to see them! Yes,
> it was run without AA, and the artifacts are likely due to the media
> container (another blob, BTW... I forgot to mention this).
>
>> Asking mostly because of my continuing look into blob related
>> bugs.Those spots look like other issues I have seen related to media
>> and blobs at the blob(s) boundary.
>
> Yes, that's likely the problem: see the attached test. The inner solid
> blob is the object used on the density pattern, and the transparent
> outer blob is the media container: you can clearly see the artifacts are
> coincident with a blob boundary.
>
> --
> jaime
Thanks for checking Jaime. The image is also helpful for understanding
your cloud technique.
Let me add my apologies for the many times I've no doubt mistyped your
name. I typed again this morning - Jamie - but saw it this time.
Many days, my eyes & brain fail to see in the moment the scrambled
things my fingers type!
Bill P.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> This is excellent. Whenever I've tried to use this type of technique
> before, I can never get the media settings right - my clouds either
> end up not-really-opaque, i.e. I can see other stuff through even the
> densest regions, or so dense that they saturate to black underneath.
Yeah... POV-Ray media isn't easy to setup. In fact it can drive you
crazy most of the time. It's happening to me now as I'm trying to add
another media for the haze (I was using a ground fog until now). But it
looks gorgeous when you find the right setup for your scene...
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
El 27/04/16 a las 12:34, William F Pokorny escribió:
> Thanks for checking Jaime. The image is also helpful for
> understanding your cloud technique.
What you don't see on the image is the other 3 concentric blobs inside
the solid one: they use the same components placement but with
increasingly smaller radius.
> Let me add my apologies for the many times I've no doubt mistyped
> your name. I typed again this morning - Jamie - but saw it this
> time.
Don't worry... I'm already used to being called Jamie. In fact I
rarely notice it: as long as all the characters are there, it looks right.
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Can't wait to see the composition with the sea.
Well, lots of artifacts and no AA, but looks promising...
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'ocean-18.jpg' (55 KB)
Preview of image 'ocean-18.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2016/04/27 11:49 PM, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
>> Can't wait to see the composition with the sea.
>
> Well, lots of artifacts and no AA, but looks promising...
>
> --
> jaime
>
It's a UFO!
=:o
--
________________________________________
-Nekar Xenos-
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignorancia org> wrote:
> > Can't wait to see the composition with the sea.
>
> Well, lots of artifacts and no AA, but looks promising...
Awesome. I look forward to this time next year when the full size version
finishes rendering!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> It's a UFO!
Good idea: if I cannot get ride of the artifacts, I could pass it for
a UFO trying to hide on the clouds using some invisibility trick... :)
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Awesome. I look forward to this time next year when the full size
> version finishes rendering!
Thanks, but it's not that slow... that test took just 29 min, and the
one attached here, using +a, took 1h45m using only 4 out of 6 cores. I
guess the full render at 1600x900 will take about 4 hours with 6 cores.
The idea of using a blob as container, instead a box or sphere, works
pretty well... it's just a shame it generates some artifacts. :(
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'ocean-18b.jpg' (84 KB)
Preview of image 'ocean-18b.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
