 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degroot org> wrote:
> For now, this will be the final render. Some minor changes are still
> possible but those need more study.
>
> In the Great Scheme of Things, this is Cathy's World #12.
>
> Thomas
Looks a lot better now with the people in the foreground, bridge and large
cylinder/tank added. I think where the pipes go into the pool needs some kind of
change as it looks like they just disappear, either a hole slightly larger than
the cylinder or some kind of surround where they enter it would probably look
better.
Sean
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> For now, this will be the final render. Some minor changes are still
> possible but those need more study.
>
> In the Great Scheme of Things, this is Cathy's World #12.
>
> Thomas
>
It is a big good job you have made here, I just have one critic
concerning the granite which seems ( but is is a personal opinion) too
smooth.
I like the people and the cat - can we have a close-up of the cat?
Lionel.
--
Do not judge my words, judge my actions.
---
http://www.avast.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Gravity (not the motion picture) -final
Date: 17 Mar 2014 11:00:03
Message: <53270df3@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 17-3-2014 14:43, s.day wrote:
> Looks a lot better now with the people in the foreground, bridge and large
> cylinder/tank added. I think where the pipes go into the pool needs some kind of
> change as it looks like they just disappear, either a hole slightly larger than
> the cylinder or some kind of surround where they enter it would probably look
> better.
Thanks. Indeed, I forgot about the pipes :-( I wanted to make the hole
slightly larger as you suggest and forgot about it.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Gravity (not the motion picture) -final
Date: 17 Mar 2014 11:16:34
Message: <532711d2@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 17-3-2014 16:05, FractRacer wrote:
> It is a big good job you have made here, I just have one critic
> concerning the granite which seems ( but is is a personal opinion) too
> smooth.
> I like the people and the cat - can we have a close-up of the cat?
>
Thanks indeed. The stone texture is one of those things I want to change
in the (near?) future.
The cat is Poser (of course). Like some Poser figures, it is not really
good at close up and it misses - in particular - a good normal map, and
its eyeball map is somewhat weird. Other figures which are more than
basic are Kate2 and Ben2 (the children here) which have hardly been
developed further than their Poser 6 versions. Not only are the skin
maps basic, also their geometry shows a number of severe defects. A
shame for such a program imho.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'poserfiguretest.png' (405 KB)
Preview of image 'poserfiguretest.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Gravity (not the motion picture) -final
Date: 17 Mar 2014 11:36:05
Message: <53271665@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In the previous image, the pupils are dilated as the light was rather
poor; If I contract the pupils, this is the result.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'poserfiguretest.png' (412 KB)
Preview of image 'poserfiguretest.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: FractRacer
Subject: Re: Gravity (not the motion picture) -final
Date: 17 Mar 2014 12:25:22
Message: <532721f2@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> In the previous image, the pupils are dilated as the light was rather
> poor; If I contract the pupils, this is the result.
>
> Thomas
For sure, the pupils are too rounded for a cat, and it seems hungry.
However it is good enough for some scenes where it is not close to the
camera. Like you made.
Lionel.
--
Do not judge my words, judge my actions.
---
http://www.avast.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 17-3-2014 14:43, s.day wrote:
> > Looks a lot better now with the people in the foreground, bridge and large
> > cylinder/tank added. I think where the pipes go into the pool needs some kind of
> > change as it looks like they just disappear, either a hole slightly larger than
> > the cylinder or some kind of surround where they enter it would probably look
> > better.
>
> Thanks. Indeed, I forgot about the pipes :-( I wanted to make the hole
> slightly larger as you suggest and forgot about it.
>
> Thomas
Don't you just love it when people point out things like that ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 17/03/2014 12:17 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> For now, this will be the final render. Some minor changes are still
> possible but those need more study.
>
> In the Great Scheme of Things, this is Cathy's World #12.
>
She is going to be a force to reckon with. If she makes it to
adolescence. ;-)
A few comments about pipework.
Pipes that width would be supported by a yoke or framework in places
along it length. You never rest a flange on a wall or both could be
damaged. And as for it disappearing into a wall without a gap. That is
okay as they are sometimes packed with flame damping material (cement
like material).
Great atmosphere Thomas.
--
Regards
Stephen
I solemnly promise to kick the next angle, I see.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 17-3-2014 18:08, s.day wrote:
> Don't you just love it when people point out things like that ;-)
>
Of course I do! One tends to get blind to the most obvious things when
poving to long on a scene ;-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 18-3-2014 8:09, Stephen wrote:
> On 17/03/2014 12:17 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> For now, this will be the final render. Some minor changes are still
>> possible but those need more study.
>>
>> In the Great Scheme of Things, this is Cathy's World #12.
>>
>
> She is going to be a force to reckon with. If she makes it to
> adolescence. ;-)
Yes, and somehow, I know she will make it. She is the kind of person
that survives (an thrives) in difficult situations like the world she
has to cope with: one of the possible/likely scenarios deriving from our
own.
>
> A few comments about pipework.
> Pipes that width would be supported by a yoke or framework in places
> along it length. You never rest a flange on a wall or both could be
> damaged. And as for it disappearing into a wall without a gap. That is
> okay as they are sometimes packed with flame damping material (cement
> like material).
I was afraid somebody would come up with that as I secretly also had
considered the problem and discarded it for the time being out of pure
laziness ;-)
>
> Great atmosphere Thomas.
Thanks Stephen.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
