POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Gravity (not the motion picture) - wip 01 Server Time
6 Oct 2024 05:27:09 EDT (-0400)
  Gravity (not the motion picture) - wip 01 (Message 11 to 20 of 36)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Gravity (not the motion picture) -final
Date: 17 Mar 2014 11:36:05
Message: <53271665@news.povray.org>
In the previous image, the pupils are dilated as the light was rather 
poor; If I contract the pupils, this is the result.

Thomas


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'poserfiguretest.png' (412 KB)

Preview of image 'poserfiguretest.png'
poserfiguretest.png


 

From: FractRacer
Subject: Re: Gravity (not the motion picture) -final
Date: 17 Mar 2014 12:25:22
Message: <532721f2@news.povray.org>

> In the previous image, the pupils are dilated as the light was rather
> poor; If I contract the pupils, this is the result.
>
> Thomas

For sure, the pupils are too rounded for a cat, and it seems hungry.
However it is good enough for some scenes where it is not close to the 
camera. Like you made.

Lionel.

-- 
Do not judge my words, judge my actions.

---

http://www.avast.com


Post a reply to this message

From: s day
Subject: Re: Gravity (not the motion picture) -final
Date: 17 Mar 2014 13:10:01
Message: <web.53272c105f5468061fd8e1370@news.povray.org>
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 17-3-2014 14:43, s.day wrote:
> > Looks a lot better now with the people in the foreground, bridge and large
> > cylinder/tank added. I think where the pipes go into the pool needs some kind of
> > change as it looks like they just disappear, either a hole slightly larger than
> > the cylinder or some kind of surround where they enter it would probably look
> > better.
>
> Thanks. Indeed, I forgot about the pipes :-( I wanted to make the hole
> slightly larger as you suggest and forgot about it.
>
> Thomas

Don't you just love it when people point out things like that ;-)


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Gravity (not the motion picture) -final
Date: 18 Mar 2014 03:10:00
Message: <5327f148$1@news.povray.org>
On 17/03/2014 12:17 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> For now, this will be the final render. Some minor changes are still
> possible but those need more study.
>
> In the Great Scheme of Things, this is Cathy's World #12.
>

She is going to be a force to reckon with. If she makes it to 
adolescence. ;-)

A few comments about pipework.
Pipes that width would be supported by a yoke or framework in places 
along it length. You never  rest a flange on a wall or both could be 
damaged. And as for it disappearing into a wall without a gap. That is 
okay as they are sometimes packed with flame damping material (cement 
like material).

Great atmosphere Thomas.


-- 
Regards
     Stephen

I solemnly promise to kick the next angle, I see.


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Gravity (not the motion picture) -final
Date: 18 Mar 2014 03:47:13
Message: <5327fa01$1@news.povray.org>
On 17-3-2014 18:08, s.day wrote:

> Don't you just love it when people point out things like that ;-)
>
Of course I do! One tends to get blind to the most obvious things when 
poving to long on a scene ;-)

Thomas


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Gravity (not the motion picture) -final
Date: 18 Mar 2014 04:12:10
Message: <5327ffda$1@news.povray.org>
On 18-3-2014 8:09, Stephen wrote:
> On 17/03/2014 12:17 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> For now, this will be the final render. Some minor changes are still
>> possible but those need more study.
>>
>> In the Great Scheme of Things, this is Cathy's World #12.
>>
>
> She is going to be a force to reckon with. If she makes it to
> adolescence. ;-)

Yes, and somehow, I know she will make it. She is the kind of person 
that survives (an thrives) in difficult situations like the world she 
has to cope with: one of the possible/likely scenarios deriving from our 
own.

>
> A few comments about pipework.
> Pipes that width would be supported by a yoke or framework in places
> along it length. You never  rest a flange on a wall or both could be
> damaged. And as for it disappearing into a wall without a gap. That is
> okay as they are sometimes packed with flame damping material (cement
> like material).

I was afraid somebody would come up with that as I secretly also had 
considered the problem and discarded it for the time being out of pure 
laziness ;-)

>
> Great atmosphere Thomas.

Thanks Stephen.

Thomas


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Gravity (not the motion picture) -final
Date: 18 Mar 2014 08:50:00
Message: <web.532840155f5468067f6b03a40@news.povray.org>
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 18-3-2014 8:09, Stephen wrote:
> > On 17/03/2014 12:17 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> >> For now, this will be the final render. Some minor changes are still
> >> possible but those need more study.
> >>
> >> In the Great Scheme of Things, this is Cathy's World #12.
> >>
> >
> > She is going to be a force to reckon with. If she makes it to
> > adolescence. ;-)
>
> Yes, and somehow, I know she will make it. She is the kind of person
> that survives (an thrives) in difficult situations like the world she
> has to cope with: one of the possible/likely scenarios deriving from our
> own.
>

Of course, or there would be no story. :-)


> >
> > A few comments about pipework.
> > Pipes that width would be supported by a yoke or framework in places
> > along it length. You never  rest a flange on a wall or both could be
> > damaged. And as for it disappearing into a wall without a gap. That is
> > okay as they are sometimes packed with flame damping material (cement
> > like material).
>
> I was afraid somebody would come up with that as I secretly also had
> considered the problem and discarded it for the time being out of pure
> laziness ;-)
>

I shall be your conscience. ;-)


Post a reply to this message

From: Alain
Subject: Re: Gravity (not the motion picture) -final
Date: 18 Mar 2014 17:10:04
Message: <5328b62c$1@news.povray.org>

> In the previous image, the pupils are dilated as the light was rather
> poor; If I contract the pupils, this is the result.
>
> Thomas

The eye lids are to human shaped. Cat's eyes are normaly much more 
rounded. Normaly, the irises show almost entirely and you see some white 
almost all the way around, except some very small gap top and bottom.

Also, I suspect that it's just a dog model morphed to look like a cat. 
The cat can elongate itself about 20% from rump to the base of it's 
skull. The shoulders are VERY mobile. They can be shifted verticaly at 
least 2/3 of the hight of the torso, and moved forward by almost as 
much. Both fore and back limbs can be crossed at the elbows or knees and 

freedom.



Alain


Post a reply to this message

From: FractRacer
Subject: Re: Gravity (not the motion picture) -final
Date: 18 Mar 2014 20:04:58
Message: <5328df2a$1@news.povray.org>

> In the previous image, the pupils are dilated as the light was rather
> poor; If I contract the pupils, this is the result.
>
> Thomas

If you search some models (like cat) go to TF3DM.com site, which 
supplies free models.

Lionel.
-- 
Do not judge my words, judge my actions.

---

http://www.avast.com


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Gravity (not the motion picture) -final
Date: 19 Mar 2014 04:24:05
Message: <53295425@news.povray.org>
On 19-3-2014 1:11, FractRacer wrote:
> If you search some models (like cat) go to TF3DM.com site, which
> supplies free models.
>

Hmm, yes. However, I need to animate them in Poser to be useful for 
me... those models do not have the right geometry.

Thomas


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.