POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Radiosity scene.. Lighting? Server Time
16 Nov 2024 02:26:40 EST (-0500)
  Radiosity scene.. Lighting? (Message 1 to 10 of 11)  
Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 1 Messages >>>
From: Mike Raiford
Subject: Radiosity scene.. Lighting?
Date: 4 Oct 2007 11:21:24
Message: <470504f4@news.povray.org>
Does the lighting look believable in this scene?


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'radtest4.jpg' (23 KB)

Preview of image 'radtest4.jpg'
radtest4.jpg


 

From: Mike Raiford
Subject: Re: Radiosity scene.. Lighting?
Date: 4 Oct 2007 11:28:05
Message: <47050685@news.povray.org>
What about this one?


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'radtest5.jpg' (20 KB)

Preview of image 'radtest5.jpg'
radtest5.jpg


 

From: Ross
Subject: Re: Radiosity scene.. Lighting?
Date: 4 Oct 2007 11:31:39
Message: <4705075b$1@news.povray.org>
They both look believable in certain ways. I'd say the first is closer, but
would be brighter and whiter (with less blue aquired from outside). That's
just my gut feeling though.


Post a reply to this message

From: Bill Pragnell
Subject: Re: Radiosity scene.. Lighting?
Date: 4 Oct 2007 11:40:00
Message: <web.470508a2f8a39077731f01d10@news.povray.org>
Mike Raiford <mra### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> What about this one?

Both very nice, but I think the first one looks more like daylight. However,
I do think your outdoors should be much, much brighter, maybe even
completely saturated. You'll probably have to lower the radiosity
brightness in that case, and antialiasing around the window frame will
suddenly get very hard, but still...

:)


Post a reply to this message

From: Alain
Subject: Re: Radiosity scene.. Lighting?
Date: 4 Oct 2007 14:37:19
Message: <470532df$1@news.povray.org>
Mike Raiford nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2007/10/04 11:19:
> Does the lighting look believable in this scene?
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
Both are realistic and beleivable.
The first is more like our eyes compensate for the contrast.
The second is more like a photograph where you underexpose everything in order 
to have the brightest parts a correct exposition.
To increase the realism, you may need to increase the light's intensity, as well 
as the brightness of the outside "worls".

-- 
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
You know you've been raytracing too long when you look at real clouds and 
criticise their media and radiosity settings.
Tom Melly


Post a reply to this message

From: Samuel Benge
Subject: Re: Radiosity scene.. Lighting?
Date: 4 Oct 2007 17:10:15
Message: <470556b7@news.povray.org>
Mike Raiford wrote:
> Does the lighting look believable in this scene?

Indeed, it does.

However, the size of the room seems small. This could be due to the size 
of the ball (I'm assuming that it's a moderately-sized beach ball) or 
the dimension ratio of the room.

Some rooms are that small, though. Good for a playroom.

Sam


Post a reply to this message

From: Ross
Subject: Re: Radiosity scene.. Lighting?
Date: 4 Oct 2007 18:08:19
Message: <47056453$1@news.povray.org>
"Samuel Benge" <stb### [at] THIShotmailcom> wrote in message
news:470556b7@news.povray.org...
> Mike Raiford wrote:
> > Does the lighting look believable in this scene?
>
> Indeed, it does.
>
> However, the size of the room seems small. This could be due to the size
> of the ball (I'm assuming that it's a moderately-sized beach ball) or
> the dimension ratio of the room.
>
> Some rooms are that small, though. Good for a playroom.
>
> Sam

Small?! They call that a two bedroom in NYC ;)


Post a reply to this message

From: Mike Raiford
Subject: Re: Radiosity scene.. Lighting?
Date: 5 Oct 2007 10:31:00
Message: <47064aa4$1@news.povray.org>
Samuel Benge wrote:

> However, the size of the room seems small. This could be due to the size 
> of the ball (I'm assuming that it's a moderately-sized beach ball) or 
> the dimension ratio of the room.

Ball scale is probably way out of whack... 2ft across if the room were 
10x10...


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Radiosity scene.. Lighting?
Date: 5 Oct 2007 10:55:00
Message: <web.47064f72f8a39077726bd13c0@news.povray.org>
"Ross" <rli### [at] speakeasynet> wrote:
> "Samuel Benge" <stb### [at] THIShotmailcom> wrote in message
> news:470556b7@news.povray.org...
> > Mike Raiford wrote:
> > > Does the lighting look believable in this scene?
> >
> > Indeed, it does.
> >
> > However, the size of the room seems small. This could be due to the size
> > of the ball (I'm assuming that it's a moderately-sized beach ball) or
> > the dimension ratio of the room.
> >
> > Some rooms are that small, though. Good for a playroom.
> >
> > Sam
>
> Small?! They call that a two bedroom in NYC ;)

In London it is a room with a view (and a beach ball)

As others have said, brighter outside and reduce the reflections on the
floor and give it some normals. It is begging for normals to break up the
perfection.



Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Alain
Subject: Re: Radiosity scene.. Lighting?
Date: 5 Oct 2007 15:49:40
Message: <47069554$1@news.povray.org>
Mike Raiford nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2007/10/05 10:28:
> Samuel Benge wrote:
> 
>> However, the size of the room seems small. This could be due to the 
>> size of the ball (I'm assuming that it's a moderately-sized beach 
>> ball) or the dimension ratio of the room.
> 
> Ball scale is probably way out of whack... 2ft across if the room were 
> 10x10...
I've had beach balls going from 2' to 3' in diameter. I've never had any smaler 
than 2'!

-- 
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
Jehovah's Witnesses: >Knock< >Knock< Shit happens.


Post a reply to this message

Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 1 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.