 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This is a tower I made in wings.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'smith.jpg' (64 KB)
Preview of image 'smith.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Good work, Tim. One thing that disturbs me a bit is the sudden interruption
of the mouldings on the right of the tower, lower half. It should integrate
harmoniously with the body of the building, imho. To the left, with the
indent, it mattters less, although the effect is the same.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tim Attwood" <tim### [at] comcast net> wrote:
> This is a tower I made in wings.
Nice. Someone's boarded up all the windows!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 13-03-2007 11:05:
> Good work, Tim. One thing that disturbs me a bit is the sudden interruption
> of the mouldings on the right of the tower, lower half. It should integrate
> harmoniously with the body of the building, imho. To the left, with the
> indent, it mattters less, although the effect is the same.
> Thomas
I have seen such abrupt stoppings on real buildings. In fact, I've seen worst,
like the molding brutaly starting and stoping somewhere across the wall, without
starting at the edge of any roof, and totaly uncentered.
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
Q. What's the difference between Batman and Bill Gates?
A. When Batman fought the Penguin, he won.
-- J. Levine
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Good work, Tim. One thing that disturbs me a bit is the sudden
> interruption of the mouldings on the right of the tower, lower half. It
> should integrate harmoniously with the body of the building, imho. To the
> left, with the indent, it mattters less, although the effect is the same.
Yeah, I think you're right. I based this on some photos of a RL
building, and looking at them the cornice wraps around the inner
corners a bit. Mostly I wanted to try out wings on something big...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tim Attwood" <tim### [at] comcastnet> schreef in bericht
news:45f724ae$1@news.povray.org...
> ...Mostly I wanted to try out wings on something big...
>
Well, you certainly succeeded :-)
It is one of those things I never found time to try out somehow. You are
giving me some ideas...
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Unfortunately, Thunderbird is showing this message as a reply to a
thread from 2000.
Does someone know how to make it thread replies by message ID, and not
by topic name?
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers wrote:
> Unfortunately, Thunderbird is showing this message as a reply to a
> thread from 2000.
>
> Does someone know how to make it thread replies by message ID, and not
> by topic name?
>
> ...Chambers
Okay, this is only safe if you like editing the user.js file. There are
two seperate issues with how T-bird threads. One is that it puts
everything with Re: <title> as a reply to the earliest thread named
<title>. The other is that it ignores references. So, add the following
to your 'user.js' file. Normal path to that file is C:\Documents and
Settings\<username>\Application Data\Thunderbird\Profiles\<random
letters and numbers>.default\user.js on windows.
# Stop threading messages together if they simply have the same subject
# (none of the messages start with "Re:")
user_pref("mail.thread_without_re", false);
# Only thread by reference headers, ignore subject
user_pref("mail.strict_threading", true);
Got that info from a thunderbird wiki that I forgot to bookmark, so I
can't quote the source and google isn't being helpful in tracking it down.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
