 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Shay wrote:
> The curve of the line connecting them was, however, traced by
> a new spline formula I invented.
Sounds like a lot of work -- but it paid off :)
Regards,
Florian
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Shay" <not### [at] notmail com> wrote in message
news:45e1ee7b$1@news.povray.org...
> Stephen Klebs wrote:
>> Very geeky cool!
>
> Though the point was that I'm not a geek. I am a manual laborer.
I'm about to be a manual labourer again. I'm about to set seige on this
house and spruce it up. I'm looking forward to seeing my toes... ;)
This is hundreds of
> thousands of triangles arranged as one would arrange bricks and wood
> into a house (blindfolded).
Heh, that's why I said 'bl00dy' in my first post. :)
~Steve~
> -Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ross wrote:
> seriously, if you use "polyhedral symmetry" in a sentence, you just might be
> a geek :)
>
>
If that makes me a geek then every guy with a hammer in his garage is a
carpenter.
This is a matter of degrees I suppose. I will say that 99% of the tech
conversations in P.O-T are beyond my level of knowledge. I didn't go to
college. I don't understand the notations used at mathworld.wolfram.com.
The time we spend at work is HUGE. How many men define themselves by the
church or bar in which they spend as little as an hour a week? I have
been a salesman or a laborer at least 40 hours a week my entire working
life.
Geeks as a group are much more intelligent than laborers, but there are
a few of we dirty f***ers out there who would surprise you.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
dlm wrote:
> See http://www.bathsheba.com/
> She turns her concepts into physical 3D forms.
I wonder if she's interested in purchasing models. My modeling methods
produce things which hers cannot (and vice-versa).
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Shay" <not### [at] notmailcom> wrote in message
news:45e34d78$1@news.povray.org...
> dlm wrote:
>
>> See http://www.bathsheba.com/
>> She turns her concepts into physical 3D forms.
>
> I wonder if she's interested in purchasing models. My modeling methods
> produce things which hers cannot (and vice-versa).
If she can do what I've seen, then she can do yours. She's a skilled
lady.
~Steve~
>
> -Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote in message news:45e3572c@news.povray.org...
> If she can do what I've seen, then she can do yours. She's a skilled
> lady.
She'll like the challenge. Go for it.
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> seriously, if you use "polyhedral symmetry" in a sentence, you just might be
>> a geek :)
>>
>>
> If that makes me a geek then every guy with a hammer in his garage is a
> carpenter.
Does knowing Graham's law of gas diffusion make me a physicist?
> This is a matter of degrees I suppose. I will say that 99% of the tech
> conversations in P.O-T are beyond my level of knowledge. I didn't go to
> college. I don't understand the notations used at mathworld.wolfram.com.
*I* don't understand half of what Wolfram says either... x_x
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nice!!!!!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Shay wrote:
>
> Geeks as a group are much more intelligent than laborers, but there are
> a few of we dirty f***ers out there who would surprise you.
>
Well you do seem to project that identity and enjoy that role.
That said, maybe you should try college.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Charter wrote:
>
> That said, maybe you should try college.
For my part, I abominate all honorable respectable toils, trials, and
tribulations of every kind whatsoever. ... I abandon the glory and
distinction of such offices to those who like them.
-Melville
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
