 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v3 <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> So... is that something like taking the reciprocol of a complex number?
Here's a good introduction in 2D:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Inversion.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> So... is that something like taking the reciprocol of a complex number?
>
> Here's a good introduction in 2D:
> http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Inversion.html
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Reciprocal.html
Seems to indicate that the reciprocal of a complex number is indeed an
inversion with respect to the unit circle in the complex plane.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Florian Brucker wrote:
> Hi Tor!
>
> Tor Olav Kristensen wrote:
>> Here's two similar ones:
> Ah, I've seen them before, but I forgot about them! The geometry is
> nice, what's the original structure?
It's a "straight" version of the isosurface used in this image:
http://hof.povray.org/Isosurface-Cubic_Space_Division.html
That structure looks similar to the one in the image in this post:
http://news.povray.org/3A21093C.4D45881A%40online.no
"Cubic Sphere Inversion" (21 Jan. 2004 to p.b.i.)
--
Tor Olav
http://subcube.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Florian Brucker wrote:
> The water would be the ultimate render time killer, I guess.
Transparency, ior and radiosity -compilation is also pretty good one ;).
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Florian Brucker wrote:
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
nice. this is quite pleasing to the eye
bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Florian Brucker wrote:
> Eero Ahonen wrote:
>> Florian Brucker wrote:
>>> The water would be the ultimate render time killer, I guess.
>> Transparency, ior and radiosity -compilation is also pretty good one ;).
>
> Yep, but that's you Aero, nobody else is that crazy :P
>
But hey, craziness is my trademark in such things. May I show the
textured versions of your inversions (well, I only have Torinet so far,
but I _will_ trace more:) here?
BTW, I'm still tracing my CGSphere draft's next version, THIS is getting
a bit too slow to get something done...
232:09:11 Rendering line 116 of 768, 4896 supersamples, 22577 rad. samples
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Florian Brucker wrote:
>
> Sure, show it! It's always interesting to see what different people make
> out of the same underlying concept :)
>
Great :). Here's the red and transparent version of Torinet...
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'torinet.jpg' (51 KB)
Preview of image 'torinet.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'torinet.jpg' (1 KB)
Download 'torinet2.jpg' (51 KB)
Preview of image 'torinet2.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
