POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : The Bullring Server Time
14 Nov 2024 04:31:13 EST (-0500)
  The Bullring (Message 1 to 8 of 8)  
From: Fernando G  del Cueto
Subject: The Bullring
Date: 25 Aug 2004 02:14:36
Message: <412c2e4c@news.povray.org>
I found out that these "things" where parts of a commercial center in 
Birmingham, UK, "the Bullring": 
http://www.bullring.co.uk/website/images/RetrieveAsset.aspx?AssetInstanceID=807

I link again to the inspiring photo:

http://www.deviantart.com/view/3316448/

and I attach my (final?) scene.

Comments & suggestions welcomed.

Fernando


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'the_bullring_mine_2.jpg' (58 KB)

Preview of image 'the_bullring_mine_2.jpg'
the_bullring_mine_2.jpg


 

From: LightBeam
Subject: Re: The Bullring
Date: 25 Aug 2004 07:22:31
Message: <412c7677$1@news.povray.org>
Fernando G. del Cueto wrote:
> I found out that these "things" where parts of a commercial center in 
> Birmingham, UK, "the Bullring": 
> http://www.bullring.co.uk/website/images/RetrieveAsset.aspx?AssetInstanceID=807 
> 
> 
> I link again to the inspiring photo:
> 
> http://www.deviantart.com/view/3316448/
> 
> and I attach my (final?) scene.
> 
> Comments & suggestions welcomed.
> 
> Fernando
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
I'm your fan ;-)
Net, modern, simple... Thoses things that mean nice renders. I love this 
one :-))


Post a reply to this message

From: Fernando G  del Cueto
Subject: Re: The Bullring
Date: 25 Aug 2004 14:26:00
Message: <412cd9b8@news.povray.org>
LightBeam wrote:

> I'm your fan ;-)
> Net, modern, simple... Thoses things that mean nice renders. I love this 
> one :-))

Ha ha ha... Thanks!! I'm glad you liked it!

If I have time (which I doubt), I'm going to try to make it look more 
similar to the original.

Fernando


Post a reply to this message

From: Fernando G  del Cueto
Subject: Re: The Bullring
Date: 25 Aug 2004 16:55:36
Message: <412cfcc8@news.povray.org>
Fernando G. del Cueto wrote:

> I found out that these "things" where parts of a commercial center in 



Sorry, I was almost asleep...

F


Post a reply to this message

From: Slime
Subject: Re: The Bullring
Date: 25 Aug 2004 18:41:16
Message: <412d158c@news.povray.org>
I like it a lot. I think the main thing that the original photo had that
your image doesn't have is the contrast in size between foreground and
background; the original had much closer white things at the bottom of the
image.

They look like candy.

 - Slime
 [ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]


Post a reply to this message

From: Jaap
Subject: Re: The Bullring
Date: 25 Aug 2004 19:15:00
Message: <web.412d1c5e20b59662a8399d8d0@news.povray.org>
"Slime" <fak### [at] emailaddress> wrote:
> I like it a lot. I think the main thing that the original photo had that
> your image doesn't have is the contrast in size between foreground and
> background;

in the rendered image the shapes seem to stay horizontal,
while in the photo they follow the surface.
i still think the rendered image looks more interesting. :-)

jaap.


Post a reply to this message

From: Fernando G  del Cueto
Subject: Re: The Bullring
Date: 25 Aug 2004 20:42:30
Message: <412d31f6@news.povray.org>
Slime wrote:

> I like it a lot. I think the main thing that the original photo had that
> your image doesn't have is the contrast in size between foreground and
> background; the original had much closer white things at the bottom of the
> image.

True, I was aware of that, but couldn't find a way (neither the time to 
tinker) to make the closer ones bigger and the farther smaller. Perhaps 
it's a lens thing, I don't know...

F


Post a reply to this message

From: Fernando G  del Cueto
Subject: Re: The Bullring
Date: 25 Aug 2004 20:44:02
Message: <412d3252@news.povray.org>
Jaap wrote:

> in the rendered image the shapes seem to stay horizontal,
> while in the photo they follow the surface.

Actually I think it's because of the lighting, because they are rotated 
with respect to the slope of the surface. But I agree, it gives that 
illusion.

> i still think the rendered image looks more interesting. :-)

Thanks!! :)

Fernando


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.