Slime wrote:
> I like it a lot. I think the main thing that the original photo had that
> your image doesn't have is the contrast in size between foreground and
> background; the original had much closer white things at the bottom of the
> image.
True, I was aware of that, but couldn't find a way (neither the time to
tinker) to make the closer ones bigger and the farther smaller. Perhaps
it's a lens thing, I don't know...
F
Post a reply to this message
|