Hello,

I extended my fluid simulator in order to handle different fluids with
different propreties.

In this simulation, I have 2 fluids. The pink fluid is 2 times more dense
than the transparent one. The objects are half dense than the transparent
fluid.

For the rendering, I play with radiosity (no light).

http://perso.orange.fr/fidos/multiphase.mpg : low res MPEG1 (< 1.9 Mo)
http://perso.orange.fr/fidos/multiphase_high.mpg : hi res MPEG1 (< 10 Mo)

Any comments are wellcome.

Regards,
Fidos

Post a reply to this message

That is truly amazing - every time i see a new one of these I'm even more 
impressed. Do you have any plans for making the fuilds mix rather than 
settle? ie use some method of averaging properties?


"fidos" <fid### [at] wanadoofr> wrote in message 
news:web.46912f7f9e63bb6a7d225d3e0@news.povray.org...
> Hello,
>
> I extended my fluid simulator in order to handle different fluids with
> different propreties.
>
> In this simulation, I have 2 fluids. The pink fluid is 2 times more dense
> than the transparent one. The objects are half dense than the transparent
> fluid.
>
> For the rendering, I play with radiosity (no light).
>
> http://perso.orange.fr/fidos/multiphase.mpg : low res MPEG1 (< 1.9 Mo)
> http://perso.orange.fr/fidos/multiphase_high.mpg : hi res MPEG1 (< 10 Mo)
>
> Any comments are wellcome.
>
> Regards,
> Fidos
>
>

Post a reply to this message

fidos wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I extended my fluid simulator in order to handle different fluids with
> different propreties.
> 
> In this simulation, I have 2 fluids. The pink fluid is 2 times more dense
> than the transparent one. The objects are half dense than the transparent
> fluid.
> 
> For the rendering, I play with radiosity (no light).

Wow, what monster rendering time did that take?

Impressive. :-)

-- 
William Tracy
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|a|f|i|s|h|i|o|n|a|d|o|@|g|m|a|i|l|.|c|o|m|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|w|t|r|a|c|y|@|c|a|l|p|o|l|y|.|e|d|u|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 > ok I may be dumb here

Yeah, maybe.

    - Warp

Post a reply to this message

Sorry,

I found most of your liquid animations quite impressive - though I probably
never said so.
BUT this one only yields an error page:


Have a nice week
Karl

Post a reply to this message

Karl Anders nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2007/07/09 06:43:
> Sorry,
> 
> I found most of your liquid animations quite impressive - though I probably
> never said so.
> BUT this one only yields an error page:

> 
> Have a nice week
> Karl
> 
> 
Chances are that the bandwidth allowance have been exeeded.

-- 
Alain
-------------------------------------------------

Post a reply to this message

"Simon" <povray@*NOSPAM*SOWare.co.uk> wrote:
> That is truly amazing - every time i see a new one of these I'm even more
> impressed. Do you have any plans for making the fuilds mix rather than
> settle? ie use some method of averaging properties?
>

Thank you for your positive reply. For the moment, the fluid can't mix. I
think that the use of particules in order to make the mix between different
fluid is necessary. It is something that I would like to acheive.

Regards,
Fidos

Post a reply to this message

William Tracy <wtr### [at] calpolyedu> wrote:
>
> Wow, what monster rendering time did that take?
>
> Impressive. :-)
>
> --
> William Tracy
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> |a|f|i|s|h|i|o|n|a|d|o|@|g|m|a|i|l|.|c|o|m|
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> |w|t|r|a|c|y|@|c|a|l|p|o|l|y|.|e|d|u|
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

The rendering time was below 48 hours for 256 frames. I used 2 passes : one
for the saving of the radiosity infos at low resolution and one for the
final rendering with aa on.

Regards
Fidos

Post a reply to this message

"Karl Anders" <kar### [at] webde> wrote:
> Sorry,
>
> I found most of your liquid animations quite impressive - though I probably
> never said so.
> BUT this one only yields an error page:

>
> Have a nice week
> Karl

Thank you for your reply.

The files are available again.

Regards,
Fidos.

Post a reply to this message

WOW!  That's totally impressive.  Great job!

Post a reply to this message

fidos wrote:
> The rendering time was below 48 hours for 256 frames. I used 2 passes : one
> for the saving of the radiosity infos at low resolution and one for the
> final rendering with aa on.

What hardware are you rendering on?

-- 
William Tracy
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|a|f|i|s|h|i|o|n|a|d|o|@|g|m|a|i|l|.|c|o|m|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|w|t|r|a|c|y|@|c|a|l|p|o|l|y|.|e|d|u|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
You know you've been raytracing too long when you hate games, but you 
buy Riven just to look at the pictures.
AmaltheaJ5

Post a reply to this message