 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"clipka" <ano### [at] anonymous org> schreef in bericht
news:4a924424$1@news.povray.org...
> Hm... I thought about it: Aside from doing motion blur, I guess the
> mechanism could also be used to create objects which are transparent, yet
> at the same time completely opaque with respect to themselves (if you get
> the meaning), which would make for a great mechanism to render "dreams" or
> "ghosts" into an image.
>
> Which is something I'm probably more in for than motion blur.
Ghosts would be great too... :-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot wrote:
> "stbenge" <not### [at] hotmailcom> schreef in bericht
> news:4a92eb8c$1@news.povray.org...
>> I could take it or leave it, since there is a way which works quite well
>> already. You probably know about it. You render a bunch of frames and
>> simply average them together in another scene. You can get away with only
>> rendering the motion-blurred object many times, while leaving the rest of
>> the scene untouched since POV can read partial images. Everything can be
>> spliced together using boxes and an orthographic camera, or rendered into
>> the actual scene geometry using Rune's illusion.inc (which is harder).
>>
>> It's not really easy, and setting up a scene in this manner can be
>> cumbersome.
>
> Yes indeed, and that is why the Motion Blur patch in Megapov is so easy to
> use: it does exactly that all by itself without interference from outside.
I did not know that...
> So, why do it the hard way when it can be done in a simple straightforward
> way?
Because you need to finish a render *now*, and can't wait for it to be
implemented?
I get a bad feeling from everyone here lately. Maybe my meds aren't
working right or something.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"stbenge" <not### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:4a9d73e8$1@news.povray.org...
> I get a bad feeling from everyone here lately.
Don't worry .... you're not the only one!
Kind of like a bad soap opera ... huh?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 21:12:22 -0300, "Jim Holsenback" <jho### [at] povrayorg>
wrote:
>> I get a bad feeling from everyone here lately.
>
You do?
>Don't worry .... you're not the only one!
>
>Kind of like a bad soap opera ... huh?
Like at a dinner party where there is an argument.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Holsenback wrote:
> "stbenge" <not### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
> news:4a9d73e8$1@news.povray.org...
>> I get a bad feeling from everyone here lately.
>
> Don't worry .... you're not the only one!
Yeah, what is it with people getting extra cranky lately?
> Kind of like a bad soap opera ... huh?
<cheezy organ cue>
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote in message
news:527s951fsg5ehlj62b18maa5crn5eplh86@4ax.com...
> Like at a dinner party where there is an argument.
ha-ha exactly ... i usually step outside for a smoke when that happens
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 19:58:20 -0300, "Jim Holsenback" <jho### [at] povrayorg>
wrote:
>"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote in message
>news:527s951fsg5ehlj62b18maa5crn5eplh86@4ax.com...
>> Like at a dinner party where there is an argument.
>
>ha-ha exactly ... i usually step outside for a smoke when that happens
>
And come back with a chainsaw? :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"stbenge" <not### [at] hotmailcom> schreef in bericht
news:4a9d73e8$1@news.povray.org...
> I get a bad feeling from everyone here lately. Maybe my meds aren't
> working right or something.
Oh dear! From what I said? I am really sorry Sam, because I just wanted to
have some opinions about the use of motion blur, nothing more. I am not
arguing or wanting to (I am not that kind of guy). So, don't take it wrong.
I suppose writing is always more ambiguous when feelings are concerned,
especially when not a native speaker....
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <tDOTdegroot@interDOTnlANOTHERDOTnet> wrote in message
news:4a9f8169$1@news.povray.org...
> I am not arguing or wanting to (I am not that kind of guy).
... agreed so perhaps I owe you an apology as well Thomas.
I saw a chance to comment on the over-all climate in these news groups
lately.
I have nothing but repect for your work and how you conduct yourself as a
contributor.
Mea Culpa
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jim Holsenback" <jho### [at] povrayorg> wrote in message
news:4a9fe416@news.povray.org...
> I have nothing but repect for your work and how you conduct yourself as a
> contributor.
hopefully everyone knows I meant type "respect" and NOT repect (hey is that
even a word?) .... and I thought I'd follow up before the spelling sheriff
issued a warrant for my arrest ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
