On Tue, 10 May 2005 14:32:22 -0600, Jim Henderson wrote:

> I'm not entirely convinced yet that this isn't a hoax, though - basically
> what they're suggesting is that through their techniques, you could
> reconstruct a hidden surface using the reflections off of a non-reflective
> surface, but I'm not totally convinced that that's possible given the
> dispersal of light.

I should've included a <g> or something in there - I'm quite familiar with
SIGGRAPH (was a member aeons ago) and know the standards they require - so
the odds are quite low in fact that it is a hoax....

Jim

Post a reply to this message