On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:20:02 -0400, Warp wrote:

> Andrew Clinton <ajc### [at] uwaterlooca> wrote:
>> Maybe you are thinking of reflections maps?  This is not a true
>> reflection
> 
>   What is a "true reflection" in your opinion?
> 
> 
Okay, I define it to be one that obeys the law of reflection at all points
(not just one).  Of course you can define it any way you'd like, but I
don't think you'd argue that this definition is "more true" than the way
reflection maps work :-)

Andrew

Post a reply to this message